The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2023
Current Practice Patterns and Training Pathways for Feeding Infants with Cleft Palate.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kotlarek Katelyn J, Benson Mikayla, Williams Jessica
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine the current trends and practices across disciplines for feeding infants with cleft palate with or without cleft lip and to describe provider training within this area.
DESIGN: Prospective survey.
SETTING: ACPA approved cleft palate teams and healthcare providers in the United States and Canada.
PARTICIPANTS: Interdisciplinary providers that regularly provide feeding services to infants with cleft palate.
INTERVENTION: 50-item survey designed and distributed electronically via the ACPA.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Information on provider demographics and practice patterns.
RESULTS: 76 respondents included providers in North America that have either currently or previously served on a cleft palate team. The majority of respondents were in speech-language pathology (49%) or nursing (38%) disciplines, worked in an outpatient setting (70%), and received no information (68%) regarding cleft palate feeding in their academic training. While specific practice patterns were relatively consistent across the respondent cohort, provider characteristics were significantly associated with squeezing the Haberman (p = .013) and likelihood of collaboration with other providers when counseling parents/caregivers (p = .039).
CONCLUSIONS: While provider characteristics varied, there were similar practice patterns observed across disciplines. Future research is needed explore training related to feeding knowledge as well as practice patterns in locations with a lower patient volume.
DESIGN: Prospective survey.
SETTING: ACPA approved cleft palate teams and healthcare providers in the United States and Canada.
PARTICIPANTS: Interdisciplinary providers that regularly provide feeding services to infants with cleft palate.
INTERVENTION: 50-item survey designed and distributed electronically via the ACPA.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Information on provider demographics and practice patterns.
RESULTS: 76 respondents included providers in North America that have either currently or previously served on a cleft palate team. The majority of respondents were in speech-language pathology (49%) or nursing (38%) disciplines, worked in an outpatient setting (70%), and received no information (68%) regarding cleft palate feeding in their academic training. While specific practice patterns were relatively consistent across the respondent cohort, provider characteristics were significantly associated with squeezing the Haberman (p = .013) and likelihood of collaboration with other providers when counseling parents/caregivers (p = .039).
CONCLUSIONS: While provider characteristics varied, there were similar practice patterns observed across disciplines. Future research is needed explore training related to feeding knowledge as well as practice patterns in locations with a lower patient volume.