MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2026.02.017

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2026

Incidence of skin and soft tissue infection in elective foot and ankle surgery utilizing iodine- vs chlorhexidine-based surgical skin preparation: A retrospective study.

Royds Miranda, Rose Gregory W, Hammond Sara, Bush Stephanie, Schwab Anthony, Terhune Tyler, Ramdass Roland S

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in elective orthopedic surgery is low, SSI remains the most common hospital-acquired infection and represents a substantial proportion of nosocomial illness. Elective foot and ankle surgery has been reported to carry a relatively higher risk of SSI compared with other orthopedic procedures. These infections are associated with increased healthcare costs, prolonged recovery, and increased patient morbidity, making perioperative infection prevention a critical aspect of surgical planning.

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative surgical site infection rates following elective foot and ankle surgery using alcohol-based chlorhexidine versus alcohol-based iodine skin antiseptic agents.

STUDY

DESIGN

Single-Surgeon, Retrospective Review.

METHODS

A total of 215 consecutive patients undergoing clean, elective foot and ankle surgery were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the preoperative skin preparation used: chlorhexidine-based preparation (n = 116) or iodine-based preparation (n = 99). Postoperative infection rates were recorded. Categorical variables, including infection, were compared using Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests.

RESULTS

Postoperative infection occurred in 1.72 % of patients in the chlorhexidine-based group and 1.02 % of patients in the iodine-based group. No statistically significant difference was observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort study, no statistically significant difference in postoperative SSI rates was observed between alcohol-based chlorhexidine and alcohol-based iodine skin preparation agents in elective foot and ankle surgery. Given the low incidence of infection and limited statistical power, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence between preparations.

Для цитирования: Royds Miranda, Rose Gregory W, Hammond Sara, Bush Stephanie, Schwab Anthony, Terhune Tyler, Ramdass Roland S. Incidence of skin and soft tissue infection in elective foot and ankle surgery utilizing iodine- vs chlorhexidine-based surgical skin preparation: A retrospective study.. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2026. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2026.02.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.