MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/arclin/acv051

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2015

The Relationship Between Apraxia of Speech and Oral Apraxia: Association or Dissociation?

Whiteside Sandra P, Dyson Lucy, Cowell Patricia E, Varley Rosemary A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Acquired apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder that affects the implementation of articulatory gestures and the fluency and intelligibility of speech. Oral apraxia (OA) is an impairment of nonspeech volitional movement. Although many speakers with AOS also display difficulties with volitional nonspeech oral movements, the relationship between the 2 conditions is unclear. This study explored the relationship between speech and volitional nonspeech oral movement impairment in a sample of 50 participants with AOS. We examined levels of association and dissociation between speech and OA using a battery of nonspeech oromotor, speech, and auditory/aphasia tasks. There was evidence of a moderate positive association between the 2 impairments across participants. However, individual profiles revealed patterns of dissociation between the 2 in a few cases, with evidence of double dissociation of speech and oral apraxic impairment. We discuss the implications of these relationships for models of oral motor and speech control.

Для цитирования: Whiteside Sandra P, Dyson Lucy, Cowell Patricia E, Varley Rosemary A. The Relationship Between Apraxia of Speech and Oral Apraxia: Association or Dissociation?. Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists. 2015. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acv051.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.