Explainable machine learning for stroke risk prediction: a comparative study with SHAP-based interpretation.

BACKGROUND

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide, making early screening and risk prediction crucial. Traditional methods have limitations in handling nonlinear relationships between variables, class imbalance, and model interpretability.

METHODS

Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), categorical boosting (CatBoost), multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network, and ensemble models were constructed and compared. Their performance in stroke risk prediction was systematically evaluated, and feature contributions were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Confusion matrices and Precision-Recall (PR) curves were used to compare the differences in recognition of the positive class (stroke patients) among the models, and training time was calculated to quantify resource consumption.

RESULTS

The ensemble model and neural network demonstrated superior overall predictive ability to traditional algorithms, with the MLP performing particularly well in terms of recall. SHAP results revealed that "hypertension," "average blood glucose level," and "age" were key influencing factors. Confusion matrices and PR curves indicated differences in positive classification among the models. Training time analysis provided a basis for resource assessment for subsequent deployment.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning methods have advantages in stroke risk prediction. Incorporating interpretability analysis can enhance the clinical credibility of the models, providing data and methodological reference for stroke risk stratification management and early warning.