MedElevator
Войти в исследования La Tunisie medicale · 2012
[Exploration of infertility: correlation hysterography hysteroscopy].
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mechhal Mourali, Ben Aoun Jihene, Hcini N, Gharsa Anissa, Oueslati Seddik, Binous Naoufel, Chaabene Mounira
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In literature, a uterine lesion in found in half of the infertile women.
AIM: To compare the results of the hysteroscopy and the hysterosalpingography in the study of the uterine cavity as exploration of feminine infertility.
METHODS: Retrospective study, over a period of four years from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2008 however, on 140 cases of infertile patients explored in the gynecology obstetrics department in Mahmoud El Matri hospital.
RESULTS: Compared with hysteroscopy, hysterography had an overall sensitivity of 76.56%, a specificity of 77.63%, a PPV of 74.24%, an NPV of 79.72% and a very strong correlation with coefficient of 0.83. Best correlations between the two examinations were found with polyps, fibroids and synechia.
CONCLUSION: Hysterosalpingography remains the first line examination in the exploration of feminine infertility. However, hysteroscopy must be realized as a second examination in case of lesions found at the hysterography or at once in certain cases.
AIM: To compare the results of the hysteroscopy and the hysterosalpingography in the study of the uterine cavity as exploration of feminine infertility.
METHODS: Retrospective study, over a period of four years from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2008 however, on 140 cases of infertile patients explored in the gynecology obstetrics department in Mahmoud El Matri hospital.
RESULTS: Compared with hysteroscopy, hysterography had an overall sensitivity of 76.56%, a specificity of 77.63%, a PPV of 74.24%, an NPV of 79.72% and a very strong correlation with coefficient of 0.83. Best correlations between the two examinations were found with polyps, fibroids and synechia.
CONCLUSION: Hysterosalpingography remains the first line examination in the exploration of feminine infertility. However, hysteroscopy must be realized as a second examination in case of lesions found at the hysterography or at once in certain cases.