MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007435-200104000-00003

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 2001

Sampling individuals with large sexual networks: an evaluation of four approaches.

Jolly A M, Wylie J L

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Methods for accessing large sexual networks are essential for investigating the mechanisms for the spread of sexually transmitted infections.

GOAL: Four samples of cases were compared with the total population to determine which identified the largest networks.

STUDY

DESIGN

Individuals with positive test results for chlamydia during a 6-month period were selected from a laboratory database and linked with sex partner information from a notifiable disease registry. Sexual networks were constructed for a random sample, people with positive results from two or more tests for chlamydia, people with positive tests results for both gonorrhea and chlamydia, and the preceding two groups combined.

RESULTS

The coinfected people combined with the repeaters yielded the highest proportion (47.8%) of large networks (>10 people), followed by the coinfected people, the repeaters, and finally the random sample.

CONCLUSIONS

People coinfected with chlamydia and gonorrhea and those with repeated chlamydial infection present ideal opportunities for both research and prevention.

Для цитирования: Jolly A M, Wylie J L. Sampling individuals with large sexual networks: an evaluation of four approaches.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 2001. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-200104000-00003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.