Interdepartmental cooperation in access-site management - verifiable persistent benefit for patients.
Аннотация
Background
Vascular access-site complications after catheterization remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. While patient- and procedure-related risk factors are well described, the impact of structured, interdisciplinary training programs is less well established. We evaluated the effect of a structured training program for cardiologists and interventional staff on access-site-related complications after transfemoral coronary interventions. Patients and methods: Over 36 months, we tracked all elective transfemoral coronary interventions at our institution. After an initial 6-month observational phase, we implemented a structured training program for cardiologists and catheter lab staff, using initial complication rates as the baseline. The training included quarterly sessions, pre-interventional angiological assessment for high-risk patients, pre-interventional assessment for all patients, and sheath removal by assistants. We prospectively assessed all access-site related complications using a standardized protocol and analysed incidence changes with a regression model, adjusting for patient-specific risk factors over time.
Results
Quarterly training and pre-interventional angiological assessment for high-risk patients did not significantly impact complication rates. However, pre-interventional angiographical assessment for all patients and sheath removal training for assistants significantly reduced complication rates. The results remained consistent after adjusting for patient-specific risk factors.
Conclusions
Structured angiological training for interventional staff significantly reduces access-site related complications. Interdisciplinary collaboration enhances patient safety and minimizes adverse events.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.