MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/00365599609181296

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology · 1996

Acute effects of unilateral pelvic ganglionectomy on urinary bladder function in vivo in the male rat.

Berggren T, Uvelius B

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Mean and maximal micturition volumes following a standardized water intake were determined before and up to three days after unilateral pelvic ganglionectomy or sham operation in adult male rats. Sham operation did not change the volumes. Unilateral ganglionectomy on the other hand decreased significantly both mean and maximal micturition volumes (and thus increased micturition frequency). The effect was most pronounced 1 day after ganglionectomy, but was still significant after 3 days. Cystometrograms were recorded without and with atropine (1 mg/kg) before operation and 1, 2 or 3 days after sham-operation or ganglionectomy. Micturition pressure decreased to about 50% 1 day after ganglionectomy and remained at this level. Atropine decreased micturition pressure in the controls to about 55% of the initial. The atropine resistant pressure response in the ganglionectomized rats amounted to 90% after 1 day, and was still above 70% after 3 days. The sham-operated controls had no residual urine without or with atropine. The unilaterally ganglionectomized animals had no residual urine in the absence of atropine, but after administration of the drug the animals rapidly developed a significant residual urine.

Для цитирования: Berggren T, Uvelius B. Acute effects of unilateral pelvic ganglionectomy on urinary bladder function in vivo in the male rat.. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. 1996. DOI: 10.3109/00365599609181296.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.