Bipolar disorders · 2008
Verapamil augmentation of lithium treatment improves outcome in mania unresponsive to lithium alone: preliminary findings and a discussion of therapeutic mechanisms.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mallinger Alan G, Thase Michael E, Haskett Roger, Buttenfield Joan, Luckenbaugh David A, Frank Ellen, Kupfer David J, Manji Husseini K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Attenuation of protein kinase C (PKC) is a mechanism common to both established (lithium, valproate) and some novel (tamoxifen) antimanic agents. Verapamil, although primarily known as a calcium channel blocker, also has PKC inhibitory activity. Verapamil has shown antimanic activity in some but not all studies. Therefore, we investigated verapamil, used alone or as an adjunctive treatment, in manic patients who did not respond to an initial adequate trial of lithium.
METHODS: Each study phase lasted three weeks. Subjects were treated openly with lithium in Phase 1 (n = 45). Those who failed to respond were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment in Phase 2 with either verapamil (n = 10) or continued-lithium (n = 8). Phase 2 nonresponders (n = 10) were assigned to combined verapamil/lithium in Phase 3.
RESULTS: Response in Phase 2 did not differ significantly between verapamil and continued-lithium. During Phase 3, response to combined treatment was significantly better than overall response to monotherapy in Phase 2 (Fisher's Exact test, p = 0.043). Mania ratings improved during combined treatment in Phase 3 by 88.2% (linear mixed model analysis, F = 4.34, p = 0.013), compared with 10.5% improvement during Phase 2.
CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary investigation, verapamil monotherapy did not demonstrate antimanic efficacy. By contrast, the combination of verapamil plus lithium was highly efficacious. Our findings thus suggest that verapamil may have potential utility as an adjunct to lithium. This effect may be mediated by additive actions on PKC inhibition, which may be an important mechanism for antimanic agents in general.
METHODS: Each study phase lasted three weeks. Subjects were treated openly with lithium in Phase 1 (n = 45). Those who failed to respond were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment in Phase 2 with either verapamil (n = 10) or continued-lithium (n = 8). Phase 2 nonresponders (n = 10) were assigned to combined verapamil/lithium in Phase 3.
RESULTS: Response in Phase 2 did not differ significantly between verapamil and continued-lithium. During Phase 3, response to combined treatment was significantly better than overall response to monotherapy in Phase 2 (Fisher's Exact test, p = 0.043). Mania ratings improved during combined treatment in Phase 3 by 88.2% (linear mixed model analysis, F = 4.34, p = 0.013), compared with 10.5% improvement during Phase 2.
CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary investigation, verapamil monotherapy did not demonstrate antimanic efficacy. By contrast, the combination of verapamil plus lithium was highly efficacious. Our findings thus suggest that verapamil may have potential utility as an adjunct to lithium. This effect may be mediated by additive actions on PKC inhibition, which may be an important mechanism for antimanic agents in general.