MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bot.0b013e3182a53130

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2014

Reoperation after combat-related major lower extremity amputations.

Tintle Scott M, Shawen Scott B, Forsberg Jonathan A, Gajewski Donald A, Keeling John J, Andersen Romney C, Potter Benjamin K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Complication rates leading to reoperation after trauma-related amputations remain ill defined in the literature. We sought to identify and quantify the indications for reoperation in our combat-injured patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients.

SETTING

Tertiary Military Medical Center.

PATIENTS/

PARTICIPANTS

Combat-wounded personnel sustaining 300 major lower extremity amputations from Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom from 2005 to 2009.

INTERVENTION: We performed a retrospective analysis of injury and treatment-related data, complications, and revision of amputation data. Prerevision and postrevision outcome measures were identified for all patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the reoperation on an amputation after a previous definitive closure. Secondary outcome measures included ambulatory status, prosthesis use, medication use, and return to duty status.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range: 16-32), 156 limbs required reoperation leading to a 53% overall reoperation rate. Ninety-one limbs had 1 indication for reoperation, whereas 65 limbs had more than 1 indication for reoperation. There were a total of 261 distinct indications for reoperation leading to a total of 465 additional surgical procedures. Repeat surgery was performed semiurgently for postoperative wound infection (27%) and sterile wound dehiscence/wound breakdown (4%). Revision amputation surgery was also performed electively for persistently symptomatic residual limbs due to the following indications: symptomatic heterotopic ossification (24%), neuromas (11%), scar revision (8%), and myodesis failure (6%). Transtibial amputations were more likely than transfemoral amputations to be revised due to symptomatic neuromata (P = 0.004; odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.45-9.22). Knee disarticulations were less likely to require reoperation when compared with all other amputation levels (P = 0.0002; OR = 7.6; 95% CI = 2.2-21.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In our patient population, reoperation to address urgent surgical complications was consistent with previous reports on trauma-related amputations. Additionally, persistently symptomatic residual limbs were common and reoperation to address the pathology was associated with an improvement in ambulatory status and led to a decreased dependence on pain medications.

Для цитирования: Tintle Scott M, Shawen Scott B, Forsberg Jonathan A, Gajewski Donald A, Keeling John J, Andersen Romney C, Potter Benjamin K. Reoperation after combat-related major lower extremity amputations.. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3182a53130.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.