MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0108

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA surgery · 2021

Safety of Combined Division vs Separate Division of the Splenic Vein in Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yamada Suguru, Fujii Tsutomu, Sonohara Fuminori, Kawai Manabu, Shibuya Kazuto, Matsumoto Ippei, Fukuzawa Kengo, Baba Hideo, Aoki Takeshi, Unno Michiaki, Satoi Sohei, Kishi Yoji, Hatano Etsuro, Uemura Kenichiro, Horiguchi Akihiko, Sho Masayuki, Takeda Yutaka, Shimokawa Toshio, Kodera Yasuhiro, Yamaue Hiroki

Клиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеEquivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

In distal pancreatectomy (DP), the splenic vein is isolated from the pancreatic parenchyma prior to being ligated and divided to prevent intra-abdominal hemorrhage from the splenic vein stump with pancreatic fistula (PF). Conversely, dissecting the splenic vein with the pancreatic parenchyma is easy and time-saving.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the safety of combined division of the splenic vein compared with separate division of the splenic vein.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

This study was designed as a multicenter prospective randomized phase 3 trial. All results were analyzed using the modified intent-to-treat set. Patients undergoing DP for pancreatic body and tail tumors were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned between August 10, 2016, and July 30, 2019.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were centrally randomized (1:1) to either separate division of the splenic vein or combined division of the splenic vein.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the incidence of grade B/C PF, and the incidence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage was included as one of the secondary end points.

RESULTS

A total of 318 patients were randomly assigned, and 2 patients were excluded as ineligible. Of the 316 remaining patients, 150 (50.3%) were male. The modified intent-to-treat population constituted 159 patients (50.3%) in the separate division group and 157 patients (49.7%) in the combined division group. In the modified intent-to-treat set, the proportion of grade B/C PF in the separate division group was 27.1% (42 of 155) vs 28.6% (44 of 154) in the combined division group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.108; 95% CI, 0.847-1.225; P = .047), demonstrating noninferiority of the combined division of the splenic vein against separate division. The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal hemorrhage in the 2 groups was identical at 1.3%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study demonstrated noninferiority of the combined division of the splenic vein compared with separate division of the splenic vein regarding safety. Thus, isolating the splenic vein from the pancreatic parenchyma is deemed unnecessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02871804.

Для цитирования: Yamada Suguru, Fujii Tsutomu, Sonohara Fuminori, Kawai Manabu, Shibuya Kazuto, Matsumoto Ippei, Fukuzawa Kengo, Baba Hideo, Aoki Takeshi, Unno Michiaki, Satoi Sohei, Kishi Yoji, Hatano Etsuro, Uemura Kenichiro, Horiguchi Akihiko, Sho Masayuki, Takeda Yutaka, Shimokawa Toshio, Kodera Yasuhiro, Yamaue Hiroki. Safety of Combined Division vs Separate Division of the Splenic Vein in Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0108.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.