MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007435-199811000-00012

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 1998

Partner notification in the real world: a four site time-allocation study.

Macke B A, Hennessy M, McFarlane M M, Bliss M J

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Although partner notification has been a long-standing intervention and prevention strategy for sexually transmitted diseases (STD), variations in partner notification practices across sites have never been documented.

GOALS OF THE STUDY: To describe provider-assisted partner notification practices in four STD programs in the United States.

STUDY

DESIGN

Eleven disease intervention specialists (DIS) in each of three urban sites and seven DIS in one rural site documented their activities and clients for 14 working days using a personal digital assistant.

RESULTS

Of 2,506 recorded activity hours across sites, 37.4% of the recorded time was spent on partner notification (PN) activities with 1148 clients. Field visits to locate contacts accounted for the largest proportion of time spent on PN. Overall, PN clients were cases of or were contacts to nonprimary and secondary (P&S) syphilis (39.6%), gonorrhea (25.5%), chlamydia (18.0%), HIV/AIDS (10.4%), and P&S syphilis (6.5%).

CONCLUSION

The activities which constitute PN, the diseases for which PN is used, and the time spent on each PN client vary across sites. More research is needed on the determinants of these variations and their association with the ultimate goal of disease prevention.

Для цитирования: Macke B A, Hennessy M, McFarlane M M, Bliss M J. Partner notification in the real world: a four site time-allocation study.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 1998. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199811000-00012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.