Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevalence, Partner Notification, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Risk Perception in a Cohort of Women Completing Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening as Part of a Safer Conception Study.

BACKGROUND

Integrating sexually transmitted infection (STI) and preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care may optimize sexual and reproductive health.

METHODS

We nested an STI substudy within a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention cohort (parent study) of 18- to 35-year-old women from South Africa, planning pregnancy with a partner with HIV or of unknown serostatus. Parent-study women completed annual surveys regarding HIV-risk perceptions and were offered oral PrEP. Preexposure prophylaxis initiators completed quarterly plasma tenofovir (TFV) testing. Substudy women completed STI screening at enrollment, 6 months, onset of pregnancy, and in the third trimester via examination, vaginal swabs tested via PCR for Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Trichomonas vaginalis , Mycoplasma genitalium , and blood tested for Treponema pallidum . Follow-up was 6 months. Women with STIs were treated, offered partner notification (PN) cards, and surveyed regarding PN practices. We describe STI prevalence and incidence, and model factors associated with prevalent infection. Sexually transmitted infection substudy and parent study-only participants were matched on age and number of days on study to assess HIV-risk perception scores between the 2 groups and the proportion with detectable TFV.

RESULTS

Among 50 substudy participants, 15 (30%) had prevalent STI. All 13 completing follow-up reported PN. Most did not prefer assisted PN. Mean HIV risk perception scores and proportion with detected plasma TFV were similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

High STI prevalence supports the importance of laboratory screening to optimize sexual health for women planning pregnancy. Rates of self-reported PN are reassuring; low interest in assisted PN suggests the need for alternative approaches. Enhanced STI care did not affect HIV-risk perception or PrEP adherence, however both were relatively high in this cohort.