MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2010

Need of improvement in timing of prophylactic antibiotic in elective surgery.

Shah J N, Maharjan S B, Piya R, Shrestha A, Shrestha K, Basnet N B, Gurung H M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Infections in surgery are major concern of morbidity, mortality, and costs. Timely antibiotic prophylaxis before incision ensures optimum concentration of AP in blood and tissues to prevent surgical site infections . However, proper timing of AP remains problematic as reported by various studies, though none so far from Nepal. Aim of this prospective observational study was to assess and address the issues for improvements in timing of AP.

METHODS

The pattern of antibiotic prophylaxis were prospectively collected in respect to time of induction, and incision time were recorded on predesigned 'AP form'. The study included all the elective major cases who received AP of intravenous Cefazoline 1 g as per our existing protocol. The emergency surgeries and obstetric cases were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

There were 125 cases of which 89% received AP before incision (63% within 5 minutes before incision), while 11% had AP after the incision and 1% within the recommended time period of 2 hour to 30 minutes before incision.

CONCLUSIONS

Current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) needs improvement as per standard guidelines of AP within 2 hour to 30 before incision.

Для цитирования: Shah J N, Maharjan S B, Piya R, Shrestha A, Shrestha K, Basnet N B, Gurung H M. Need of improvement in timing of prophylactic antibiotic in elective surgery.. JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.