MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/513979

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infectious diseases · 1997

Urethral infection in a workplace population of East African men: evaluation of strategies for screening and management.

Jackson D J, Rakwar J P, Chohan B, Mandaliya K, Bwayo J J, Ndinya-Achola J O, Nagelkerke N J, Kreiss J K, Moses S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Transport workers (n = 504) in Mombasa, Kenya, were screened for urethral infection by history, clinical examination, and laboratory testing of urethral swabs and first-catch urine specimens. The prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae was 3.4%, Chlamydia trachomatis, 3.6%, and Trichomonas vaginalis, 6.0%; more than two-thirds of infections were asymptomatic. A complaint of urethral discharge, dysuria, or both was twice as sensitive as the sign of discharge on physical examination (34.5% vs. 15.5%) in identifying infection. A positive leukocyte esterase dipstick (LED) test on urine predicted infection with a sensitivity of 95.0% and a specificity of 59.3% in symptomatic men and with a sensitivity of 55.3% and a specificity of 82.8% in asymptomatic men. Demographic and behavioral factors were not independent predictors of infection. In resource-poor settings with high prevalences of urethral infection, an effective screening and management strategy would be to treat symptomatic men, as well as asymptomatic men with a positive LED test, for all three infections.

Для цитирования: Jackson D J, Rakwar J P, Chohan B, Mandaliya K, Bwayo J J, Ndinya-Achola J O, Nagelkerke N J, Kreiss J K, Moses S. Urethral infection in a workplace population of East African men: evaluation of strategies for screening and management.. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1997. DOI: 10.1086/513979.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.