MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mai.2001.119412

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2001

Anaphylaxis to gelatin-containing rectal suppositories.

Sakaguchi M, Inouye S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Some children--though the number is few-have been sensitized with gelatin.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the presence of antigelatin IgE and anaphylaxis to gelatin-containing rectal suppository, we measured antigelatin IgE in the sera of the children with anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Ten children showed systemic allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to a chloral hydrate rectal suppository containing gelatin (231 mg/dose) that had been used as a sedative. These children's clinical histories and serum samples were submitted from physicians to the National Institute of Infectious Diseases during a 2-year period from 1996 to 1997.

RESULTS

Of the 10 children, 5 showed apparent anaphylaxis, including hypotension and/or cyanosis, along with urticaria or wheezing; 2 showed both urticaria and wheezing without hypotension or cyanosis; the other 3 showed only urticaria. All of the children had antigelatin IgE (mean value +/- SD, 7.9 +/- 8.4 Ua/mL). As a control, samples from 250 randomly selected children had no antigelatin IgE. These findings suggest that the 10 children's systemic allergic reactions to this suppository were caused by the gelatin component.

CONCLUSION

Gelatin-containing suppositories must be used with the same caution as gelatin-containing vaccines and other medications.

Для цитирования: Sakaguchi M, Inouye S. Anaphylaxis to gelatin-containing rectal suppositories.. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2001. DOI: 10.1067/mai.2001.119412.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.