INTRODUCTION
Kidney biopsy has represented the reference standard for the classification and the diagnosis of glomerular disorders for a long time. Notwithstanding this, in recent years a growing amount of attention has been paid to reframing the role of histological findings at kidney biopsy, which must be considered patterns of tissue damage rather than diseases themselves, and that should be linked to specific pathomechanisms [ 1 , 2 ]. This approach has the advantage of helping to precisely identify therapeutic targets and to define prognosis, thus tailoring clinical management. We distinguish three main categories of glomerular diseases: (i) immune-mediated glomerulopathies that encompass distinct histopathological patterns [e.g. immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, membranous nephropathy (MN), C3 glomerulopathy, etc.], all showing immune deposits on kidney biopsy; (ii) systemic diseases with glomerular involvement [e.g. lupus nephritis (LN), monoclonal gammopathies, metabolic storage diseases, etc.], with a wide spectrum of histologic findings; and (iii) podocytopathies, with a typical pathological picture of diffuse mesangial sclerosis (DMS), minimal-changes (MC), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) or collapsing glomerulopathy (CG) [ 2 ]. Podocytopathies have been increasingly recognized as a group of glomerular disorders in which direct or indirect podocyte injury drives proteinuria and progressive kidney disease [ 2 ]. Following a huge technological development, many steps forward have been taken in unravelling the causes and the pathogenesis of this group of disorders, pushing nephrologists to face the challenge of integrating different types of information and advanced diagnostic tools in the management of patients suspected to suffer from podocytopathies.
In this manuscript, we will review the current understanding of the main pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for podocytopathies together with their clinical presentation, diagnostic toolkit and lines of treatment available, providing food for thought for recent, cutting-edge advances in each of these topics.
WHAT ARE PODOCYTOPATHIES?
Advances in microscopy, genetics and molecular studies have provided significant improvement in the characterization of the glomerular filtration barrier (GFB), raising podocytes as the culprit cells in maintaining structural and functional integrity [ 2 , 3 ]. Podocytes’ adaptive response to stimuli preserves glomerular filtration, prevents the loss of cells and molecules in the urine and promotes to some extent regeneration [ 4 , 5 ]. Moving forward the traditional anatomopathological classification (i.e. identifying histologic lesions with specific disease entities) triggered off the concept that podocyte patterns of damage could represent the end result of diverse glomerular noxae with different mechanisms, prognosis and potentially specific therapeutic targets [ 1 , 2 ]. Indeed, podocytopathies encompass a broad spectrum of aetiologies, including genetic defects, permeability factor/s, immunologic dysfunction, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition, infectious agents, drugs, malignancies and maladaptive responses, with different prevalence across infancy, adolescence and adulthood [ 2 , 6 ] (Fig. 1 ). To complicate the picture further, growing evidence suggests the possibility of the presence of podocytopathy in the context of other immune-mediated diseases (e.g. lupus podocytopathy, ‘podocytopathic features’ in the context of IgA nephropathy), with implications for management and prognosis [ 7 , 8 ].

For a detailed classification of the aetiology and pathomechanisms of podocytopathies, we refer to a recent review on this topic [ 2 ].
Increasing evidence supports the hypothesis that podocyte injury can result from a single causative agent or a combination of multiple factors acting with complex mechanisms, prompting multifactoriality as relevant in the pathophysiology of these disorders (Fig. 1 ). Indeed, multiple, low or medium effect-size genetic, environmental and/or lifestyle-related insults to the GFB can represent additional risk factors finally favouring podocyte injury [ 2 ] (Fig. 1 ). The identification of APOL1 polymorphic variants (namely G1 and G2 risk alleles) represented a revolution in understanding the racial difference in susceptibility to HIV infection-associated nephropathy, FSGS or ‘hypertensive nondiabetic kidney disease’ in patients of Black ancestry [ 9 , 10 ]. In this view, HIV infection probably represents the ‘second hit’ required to develop glomerular injury and kidney disease in genetically predisposed subjects [ 11 ]. Low birth weight (LBW), prematurity, gestational and fetal distress, previous episodes of acute kidney injury (AKI) and nephrotoxins exposure, obesity, diabetes, high-salt diet and ageing represent other examples of risk factors (Fig. 1 ) [ 2 , 12 ]. Of note, whatever the cause and the combination of risk factors acting in determining the onset of podocyte injury and loss, the resulting reduced number of functioning nephrons causes the workload to be spread over the remaining nephrons in an attempt to compensate for the metabolic and functional needs of the body [ 12 , 13 ]. Although representing a functional adaptation, hyperfiltration of the remnant units establishes a vicious circle leading to gradual sclerosis of the entire pool of nephrons and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression [ 12 , 13 ].
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS AND INITIAL DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP
Irrespective of the primary insult, podocyte damage, detachment and loss increase the permeability of GFB, causing proteins to be filtered in the urine. According to this, the clinical hallmark of podocytopathies is proteinuria, ranging from subnephrotic to nephrotic range [ 14 ]. When associated with oedema, hypoalbuminaemia and hyperlipidaemia, nephrotic-range proteinuria outlines the complete picture of nephrotic syndrome (NS) [ 14 ]. Of note, the severity and variety of clinical features accompanying proteinuria are usually related to the entity and the rate of protein loss, with differences between adults and children (Fig. 2 ) [ 2 , 15 , 16 ]. In the former, proteinuria usually has a gradual onset, causing protein levels to drop either in plasma or on the extracellular side, preventing the shift of fluids to the interstitium. This makes the development of clinically relevant oedema subtle and mostly dependent on sodium retention [ 2 ]. Consequently, proteinuria can be frequently detected incidentally in the adult population. Conversely, in children marked hypoalbuminaemia causes a fluid shift from plasma to the relatively hyperoncotic interstitium, resulting in generalized pitting oedema [ 15–17 ]. Of note, these dichotomic presenting features are not exclusive to specific age groups [ 15 , 16 ]. AKI and microscopic haematuria are not typical features of podocytopathies, and their presence is of no help in either confirming or excluding this hypothesis [ 18 , 19 ].

Virtually any glomerular disease presenting with proteinuria may resemble a podocytopathy. For this reason, a stepwise approach is fundamental in order to establish a precise diagnosis (podocytopathies versus other glomerular diseases), its aetiology and to guide therapy (Fig. 2 ). As an initial clinical assessment, detailed medical history is essential: some risk factors or possible causes have different epidemiology according to the patient's age, ethnicity or gender, and can be simultaneously detected in the same patient (Fig. 2 ). This process is critical in unravelling the aetiology of the disease, irrespective of clinical presentation, the severity of proteinuria and age at onset (Fig. 2 ). Given the high prevalence of genetic forms in infancy and childhood, the presence of extra-renal signs potentially suggestive of syndromic disorders, as well as a positive familial history of kidney diseases, should be carefully evaluated by deep phenotyping and genetic counselling, since genetic forms are likely to be unresponsive to immunosuppressive therapy [ 18 ]. Of note, recent evidence suggests that this is not exclusive to the paediatric population [ 19 ]. All additional clinical information (e.g. drug exposure, history of previous or concomitant infections, systemic symptoms, etc.) should be recorded at the time of the first evaluation. Successively, first-line laboratory investigations mainly aimed at excluding alternative diagnostic hypotheses should be ordered (Fig. 2 , Table 1 ) [ 14 , 20 ]. Kidney ultrasound scanning (US) is usually performed in adults, while it represents a second-tier examination in children [ 14 , 20 ].
Table 1.
Clinical work-up in patients with proteinuria
NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; IFN, interferon; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; CMV, citomegalovirus; EBV, Ebstein–Barr virus; ANCAs, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; PAN, polyarteritis nodosa; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; TIN, tubulo-interstitial nephritis; MM, multiple myeloma; MPGN, membrano-prolipherative glomerulonephritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
| Aetiologic clues | Supporting the diagnosis of podocytopathies | Supporting alternative diagnosis | Ref. |
| Drugs Lithium, NSAIDs, rifampicin, cephalosporins, IFN therapies, mTOR and calcineurin inhibitors, anthracyclines, bisphosphonates, anabolic steroids, etc. Penicillamine, gold salts, elemental mercury, anti-TNF therapy, tiopronin, etc. | These drugs may be associated with MC and/or FSGS. In MC, proteinuria generally resolves within weeks if therapy is discontinued. This relationship is less strong in FSGS. Not reported or unclear association. | Kidney injury related to these drugs is not limited to podocytopathies. AKI, together with signs of TIN, suggests alternative mechanisms of nephrotoxicity. Specific assessment should be performed. Exposure to these drugs, in the presence of nephrotic proteinuria, may underlie secondary MN. | [ 22 ] [ 23 ] [ 24 ] |
| Infections HIV, CMV, parvovirus B19, EBV, SARS-CoV-2 HCV, HBV | Listed viruses are usually associated with FSGS or CG. In the presence of CG, proteinuria is usually more severe than FSGS, and kidney dysfunction is easily traceable. Once the diagnosis is established, treatment should be aimed at resolving the underlying infection. These viruses are usually not associated with podocytopathies. | AKI without proteinuria, TIN and, less commonly, acquired tubulopathies, suggest different mechanisms of infections-mediated kidney injury. Nephrotoxicity caused by anti-infective drugs can make the diagnosis harder. HCV- and HBV-associated nephropathies include MPGN with or without cryoglobulins, MN and PAN. | [ 24 ] [ 25 ] [ 26 ) [ 27 ] [ 28 ] [ 29 ] |
| VEGF inhibition Pregnancy Treatment with VEGF inhibitors | The presence of proteinuria, with or without full-blown clinical signs of preeclampsia, suggests a podocytopathy. Proteinuria is usually associated with MC or FSGS. | Although preeclampsia is the most common cause of AKI in pregnancy, other causes must be ruled out, especially in the absence of proteinuria. AKI, TMA, MN, nephritic syndrome and proliferative glomerulonephritis have been uncommonly reported. | [ 30 ] [ 31 ] [ 32 ] |
| Autoimmune diseases SLE ANCA vasculitis, Sjögren's syndrome, PAN, other vasculitides | In the majority of cases, proteinuria does not support the diagnosis of a podocytopathy in patients with SLE. Lupus podocytopathy, usually presenting with isolated NS in a patient with LES, represents an exception. Podocytopathies are not a feature of these diseases. | Proteinuria in patients with SLE is usually associated with specific histologic patterns (i.e. LN). Additional clinical findings are common (e.g. active sediment). Even though proteinuria can be a manifestation of these diseases, it is usually subnephrotic and underlies rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (vasculitis) or a TIN (Sjögren's). | [ 33 ] [ 34 ] [ 35 ] [ 36 ] [ 37 ] |
| Malignancies Haematologic malignancies (leukemias, lymphomas) Solid tumours | MC and FSGS can be incidentally associated with leukemias and lymphomas. Rarely associated. | Tubular dysfunction, AKI and/or cancer drug nephrotoxicity are far more common. MM can anyway present with NS. Suggest the association with MN. | [ 38 ] [ 39 ] |
| Maladaptive Congenital (e.g. unilateral renal agenesis, oligomeganephronia, kidney hypodysplasia, etc.) or acquired (e.g. surgical reduction of renal mass, kidney transplant, etc.) conditions | These conditions are associated with FSGS when a biopsy is performed. Proteinuria is usually sub-nephrotic, slowly progressing. Occasionally, NS can be the clinical presentation of these conditions. | Usually associated with hypertension, kidney dysfunction and other clinical signs. | [ 40 ] [ 41 ] [ 42 ] |
| Genetic Extra-renal involvement Familial history of kidney disease Resistance to treatment | Strongly support the diagnosis of podocytopathies, especially in patients with NS. MC, FSGS and DMS represent the typical patterns on kidney biopsy. Strongly support the diagnosis of podocytopathies, especially in patients with NS. MC, FSGS and DMS represent the typical patterns on kidney biopsy. Strongly support the diagnosis of podocytopathies, especially in patients with NS. MC, FSGS and DMS represent the typical patterns on kidney biopsy. | Not exclusive to genetic podocytopathies. Not exclusive to genetic podocytopathies. Other causes of resistance to treatment (e.g. lack of compliance, advanced kidney damage) should be considered in the differential diagnosis. | [ 43 ] |
If the initial diagnostic work-up still points towards the hypothesis of a podocytopathy as the cause of proteinuria, then the clinical management differs according to the patient’s age and severity of proteinuria (Fig. 2 ). Patients with sub-nephrotic proteinuria should receive antiproteinuric therapy irrespective of their age at onset. Moreover, if a clear aetiology of podocyte injury is shown by the diagnostic work-up, then patients should be treated accordingly (Fig. 2 ). While in adults, kidney biopsy is anyway considered in order to confirm the diagnosis and to assess prognostic markers of disease progression, in children it is usually reserved for patients showing disease progression, lack of response to treatment or additional findings (Fig. 2 ) [ 2 ]. Kidney biopsy is mandatory in adults presenting with NS, either to exclude other types of glomerulopathies or to assess the degree of chronicity in podocytopathies (Fig. 2 ). When kidney biopsy confirms the diagnosis of podocytopathy and blood tests do not point to a specific aetiology, a steroid challenge is suggested [ 14 ]. A lack of response defines steroid-resistant NS (SRNS), necessitating the assessment of genetic causes [ 14 ]. Conversely, in children kidney biopsy can be initially avoided in favour of a course of steroids when blood pressure, complement levels and kidney function are normal and the suspicion of a podocytopathy is strong [ 14 , 21 ]. Approximately 80%–90% of patients will experience complete remission within 4 weeks of therapy, defining steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). SRNS imposes genetic testing, kidney biopsy and gradual steroid tapering [ 14 ].
INNOVATIONS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PODOCYTOPATHIES
The lack of serum or urinary biomarkers with specific features (i.e. safety, non-invasivity, ease-to-measure, accuracy, consistency between different ethnic groups and genders, etc.) has recently opened up a research quest in the field of podocytopathies. Many hopes to develop innovative diagnostic tools lie in new high-throughput technologies (i.e. ‘omics’) [ 44 ]. Proteomic studies in patients with podocytopathies proposed alpha-1 antitrypsin, transferrin, histatin-3, 39S ribosomal protein L17 and calretinin as new potential urinary markers [ 45 ]. Recently, measuring non-coding RNA (e.g. micro-RNA) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) in serum and urine were proposed as innovative non-invasive diagnostic essays [ 46 , 47 ]. If confirmed in larger cohorts, then these studies can provide other possible sources of knowledge, fostering the capability to differentiate underlying aetiologies and possibly to detect new specific therapeutic targets [ 48 ]. In the future, these essays could serve as ‘liquid biopsies’, potentially preventing invasive investigations as well as bringing forward integration with clinical information and kidney biopsy findings.
THE ROLE OF KIDNEY BIOPSY
Podocytopathies are associated with MC, DMS, FSGS and CG findings at kidney biopsy. They all share the absence of immune deposits by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy (EM) and can be collectively viewed as a spectrum of glomerular patterns in which progression from normality to global glomerulosclerosis is related to the amount of podocyte loss and the type of parietal epithelial cells (PECs) response. Several lines of evidence support the podocyte depletion hypothesis, showing the histological consequences of precise degrees of podocyte loss, from mesangial expansion to focal and ultimately global glomerulosclerosis [ 49 , 50 ]. On the other hand, the amount of podocyte replacement driven by PECs that act as podocyte progenitors, together with the efficient or inadequate differentiation into podocytes, is the other determinant of a successful repair strategy, resulting in maintaining normal glomerular appearance or in the development of glomerular hyperplastic lesions in the Bowman space [ 51 ].
MC and FSGS represent a continuum of the same progressive disease [ 52 , 53 ]. In MC, glomerular appearance by light microscopy is normal and podocyte injury detectable by EM as widespread foot processes effacement, without glomerular basement membrane (GBM) denudation [ 54 ]. In the setting of chronic noxae not extinguishing over time (e.g. genetic mutations, maladaptive conditions, etc.) [ 4 , 55 , 56 ], and/or an inadequate capacity of PECs to replace lost podocytes usually due to inefficient differentiation [ 51 ], podocyte loss exceeds 20% and segmental denudation of GBM initiates the injury cascade leading to scar formation [ 49 ]. Glomerulosclerosis can be limited in settings of high regenerative potential as in DMS, a pattern of injury found in children younger than 5 years old with NS progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [ 57 ]. This particular age span is characterized by a high capacity to generate new podocytes from PECs to support glomerular size growth [ 4 , 58 ]. In this setting, severe podocyte loss, mainly driven by major genetic alterations, is associated with diffuse accumulation of extracellular matrix protein in the mesangium and signs of a massive podocyte turnover, highlighted by a halo of hypertrophic podocytes surrounding capillary loops [ 59 ]. A fast and massive podocyte loss constitutes a particular setting of abrupt capillary collapse, as in CG. This scenario triggers a rapid and catastrophic response of PECs acting as podocyte progenitors in order to replace lost cells. Despite retaining the ability to proliferate, differentiation of PECs into mature podocytes is prevented, thus resulting in the formation of pseudocrescent, a non-inflammatory lesion constituted by a crowd of hyperplastic epithelial cells filling the urinary space [ 13 , 60 ]. This lesion is encountered in conditions of direct, massive podocyte injury (e.g. drug exposure, viral infections, etc.) [ 2 ].
Interestingly, detection of podocyte injury is limited with standard techniques of renal pathology. Principal limitations are due to the focal nature of the injury, which reduces the sensibility of sampling [ 52 ], and the scarce evidence of early stages of podocyte damage. Bearing this in mind, the approach to kidney biopsy in podocytopathies needs technical facilities capable of providing not only structural and ultrastructural analysis but also the possibility of ad hoc supplementary essays integration and close collaboration with specialists of different fields to include the histologic pattern of injury in a comprehensive evaluation of patient's data.
INNOVATIONS IN RENAL PATHOLOGY
As patient stratification based only on histological classification has proven to provide little help in defining patient prognosis, therapeutic targets and response to treatment, new approaches are trying to overcome the limits of standard renal pathology and assess risk features of disease progression. An example is represented by the application of super-resolution microscopy (SRM) techniques on tissue sections obtained from the diagnostic routine. SRM has the advantage of allowing 3D visualization of the slit diaphragm, giving direct evidence of structural changes or podocyte loss [ 61 , 62 ]. In addition, these techniques have the potential to provide panoramic views of the entire tissue samples, thus enabling a more reliable evaluation of prognostic relevant lesions. Apart from morphology, kidney biopsy offers direct access to kidney tissue for high-throughput analysis (including scRNAseq) [ 63 ], improving the characterization of mechanisms involved in the pathological processes [ 64 ]. The combination of these techniques with digital pathology and bioinformatic analysis offers new perspectives to capture the complex structural changes in kidney biopsies and molecular heterogeneity of these diseases. This integration has the potential to cluster into clinically and biologically relevant subgroups, thus uncovering histologic parameters associated with clinical outcomes and molecular signatures not included in current classification systems [ 65 ].
As non-immune-mediated nephropathies, podocytopathies do not show significant immune-complexes deposition by immunofluorescence or EM and occasional low-intensity positive staining for IgM and C3 are considered macromolecular trapping rather than specific deposition. Nevertheless, the recent detection of anti-nephrin autoantibodies in adults and children with biopsy-proven MC provides support for an autoimmune aetiology in a subset of patients [ 66 ]. Interestingly, these patients showed podocyte-associated punctate IgG staining at immunofluorescence, together with an increased serum titer of anti-nephrin autoantibodies, suggesting a pathogenic role for a long-searched circulating factor [ 66 ]. Considering the paradigm shift induced by the identification of several autoantigens in MN [ 67 ], these findings may lay the groundwork to distinguish a subset of patients susceptible to specific treatments.
PRINCIPLES OF TREATMENT
As for all glomerular disorders, the ideal goal of treatment in podocytopathies is complete remission of the disease (i.e. proteinuria disappearance and normalization of kidney function) [ 14 , 21 ] that prevents CKD progression and ensures favourable long-term kidney and global outcomes [ 68–70 ]. Treatment must target the cause of podocyte injury whenever possible, claiming an aetiologic classification of podocytopathies as fundamental. Unfortunately, in most cases, the primary cause is putative or unknown. This has long led to non-specific therapeutic approaches based on steroids and immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, etc.) as the cornerstones of treatment. Steroids are straightforwardly recommended in routine clinical practice as first-line therapeutic agents, especially in MC and FSGS [ 14 ]. Their effectiveness is claimed as a proof-of-concept of the pathogenic role of the circulating factor/s, although experimental evidence of their exact mechanisms of action is still lacking. Of note, resistance to steroids defines the subsequent disease management (Fig. 2 ) and has prognostic value [ 68–70 ]. However, the lack of a consistent definition of steroid resistance represents an important source of bias [ 1 ]. Immunosuppressive drugs and plasmapheresis conceptually follow the line traced by steroids in the treatment of podocytopathies. In addition, they can be used as steroid-sparing drugs when repeated steroid cycles are needed or to avoid adverse effects, or as second-line therapies in the case of steroid resistance when a genetic cause is not confirmed or still pending [ 14 ].
Besides favouring lexical chaos (i.e. using primary or idiopathic FSGS/MC as synonyms of circulating factor/s-related disease), this approach prevented clinical trials from being correctly designed to address the unmet medical need of providing patients with targeted, effective, non-toxic and tailored (i.e. personalized) therapies. Consequently, in the last few decades, there has been a paucity of novel treatments in the field of podocytopathies [ 1 ].
For all these reasons, focusing on slowing the progression towards ESKD does represent the primary goal of the treatment in the majority of patients, especially when interventions aimed at targeting the specific cause are limited or inefficient, or CKD is already established. Until recently, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) have represented the main, if not only, therapeutic options for patients with podocytopathies, together with supportive care (e.g. low-sodium diet, weight control, avoidance of additional insults, etc.). RASi act on the podocyte shear stress driven by hyperfiltration by reducing the trans-glomerular hydraulic pressure gradient, irrespective of the primary cause of the disease. Very recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) emerged as extraordinarily promising tools in the nephrologist's armamentarium [ 71 ]. Although the exact mechanisms of action are still under investigation, experimental and clinical evidence suggest that SGLT2i are effective in reducing glomerular hyperfiltration and in ensuring nephroprotection in the long run in different types of nephropathies, including FSGS [ 72 ]. A dedicated trial is ongoing (EMPA-KIDNEY trial) [ 73 , 74 ]. Following this principle, the endothelin type A antagonists sparsentan and atrasentan recently proved to be effective in preventing disruption of the actin cytoskeleton in experimental FSGS [ 75 ]. Phase II and III trials enrolling FSGS patients are currently ongoing [ 76 , 77 ].
INNOVATIONS IN THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES
Increasing efforts to define the aetiological basis of clinical phenotypes will likely improve the potential success of clinical trials. Starting from the observation that a putative circulating factor could bind to the podocytes glycocalyx, galactose was tested in nephrotic patients because of its potential competitive binding action [ 78 ]. The GBM and podocytes themselves are considered as novel potential targets for molecules acting on mitochondrial function and actin–myosin contractile structure [ 79 ]. In this regard, a role in stabilizing the podocyte actin cytoskeleton has been proposed also for steroids, CNIs, ACTH and rituximab [ 80 , 81 ]. New strategies targeting the short transient receptor potential channels [ 82 ], the soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 [ 83 ], soluble urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor [ 84 ] and substrate intermediates for coenzyme Q10 are under investigation [ 85 ]. Some efforts have also been directed to blocking the progression of scarring and fibrosis following podocyte damage in patients affected by FSGS targeting the inhibition of C-C chemokine receptor type 2 [ 86 , 87 ], the nuclear factor-κB transcription [ 88 ] and Slit-2 [ 89 ]. Finally, genetic discoveries will play a major role towards personalized medicine, thus tailoring therapies with the best chance of response in carefully selected patients. Novel experimental molecules under investigation include the inhibitors of apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1), such as VX-147, that are currently under investigation in a phase II trial in adults with FSGS and APOL1 high-risk genotypes [ 90 ]. However, the results of these studies still need confirmation to be translated into clinical practice.
GENETICS OF PODOCYTOPATHIES
Solid evidence about the role of genetic abnormalities in causing podocytopathies is currently available, in both children and in adults. Although the first insights into the pathogenic role of genetic defects date to the end of the 1990s [ 91 ], next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies revolutionized our understanding of the genetic makeup of podocytopathies. Nowadays, we are able to assign a causal relationship between genetic variants and phenotype (namely SRNS, nephrotic-range proteinuria, pathologic patterns of FSGS, MC or DMS) to >50 genes [ 3 , 92 , 43 ]. Historically, the majority of them were classified as ‘podocyte genes’ since they encode proteins with critical roles in maintaining the integrity of the culprit cells of the GFB [ 93–96 ]. The corresponding diseases are referred to as monogenic podocytopathies, with precise indications for treatment and medical management [ 2 , 97 , 98 ]. These conditions encompass a wide spectrum of isolated as well as syndromic kidney phenotypes, all respecting classical Mendelian patterns of inheritance as listed in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database [ 99 ]. Syndromic disorders result from the expression of causative genes in extra-kidney organs, such as the inner ear, eyes or central nervous system, and are usually recognized with appropriate clinical diagnostic work-up [ 43 ]. Overall, monogenic podocytopathies account for ∼30% of cases undergoing genetic testing [ 95 , 100 ]. Interestingly, the frequency is comparable in familial and sporadic cases, and remained stable over time even after the spreading of NGS in diagnostics [ 43 , 95 ]. As a matter of fact, until recently, the majority of patients presenting with clinical features of podocytopathies finally turned out to be negative to standard genetic investigations, namely NGS targeted sequencing for podocyte genes. An unacceptable proportion of these patients anyway progressed to ESKD, requiring an improvement in understanding of the pathophysiology of these diseases. Indeed, increasing the number of genes tested did not improve the diagnostic rate even with the wide use of whole-exome sequencing (WES) [ 92 , 101 ]. As in other disorders, a forward approach to genetic investigations risks limiting diagnostic efficacy in podocytopathies. Increasing evidence suggests that phenocopies can represent a proportion of patients presenting with clinical features of podocytopathies as high as that represented by genetically proven monogenic podocytopathies [ 97 , 98 ]. Indeed, a strictly phenotype-centered in silico filtration of variants identified by massive sequencing would miss variants associated with syndromic disorders in patients presenting with either apparently isolated kidney involvement or no familial history [ 97 ]. Strategies for the identification of these cases currently rest on a comprehensive genetic screening with WES (i.e. genetic testing including all genes responsible for CKD) and efforts to detect overlooked signs of the disease in the patients or in family members (i.e. reverse phenotyping) in order to confidentially confirm the genetic diagnosis [ 98 , 101–103 ]. Interestingly, a huge amount of data support mutations in COL4A genes as the most frequent cause of familial and sporadic FSGS without overt signs of extra-renal involvement [ 104 , 105 ]. The demonstration of possible overlapping phenotypes induced by COL4A and podocyte genes suggests a conceptual revision of disease boundaries and ontology. As in many other disorders, although few genes are responsible for the majority of cases, singletons are frequently reported as involved in a significant fraction of the remaining cases [ 98 , 106 , 107 ]. Since there is no possibility to a priori exclude mutation in one out of the >250 genes, WES applies as the first-choice approach for genetic testing in patients with podocytopathies. Interestingly, recent evidence supports cost-effectiveness of this strategy [ 108 ].
INNOVATIONS IN GENETICS OF PODOCYTOPATHIES
Despite the huge amount of information that it can eventually provide, WES has some limitations that must be taken into account in interpreting the results of genetic testing. Increasing evidence suggests that genetic variants in intronic and regulatory regions of DNA can be relevant in determining phenotypic consequences, mainly affecting splicing and gene expression. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) could be of help in overcoming this obstacle. Preliminary results including rare kidney diseases have already been published [ 106 ]. Although still in its infancy, the clinical utility of WGS could improve the diagnostic efficacy of genetic investigations in the field of podocytopathies. Other technical issues (i.e. analysis of uncovered regions, copy number variations) should also be assessed in a case-by-case setting.
As for many other diseases, we currently classify the results of genetic testing according to strict pathogenicity criteria based on a classical Mendelian concept of genotype–phenotype correlation [ 109 ]. However, the genetic make-up of podocytopathies is probably more complex than previously thought. High-frequency and low effect-size variants in podocyte genes (e.g. G1/G2 risk alleles in APOL1 ) already proved relevant in contributing to disease onset and progression when coupled with additional ‘hits’. Interestingly, in an experimental model, the equivalent of the human p.R229Q polymorphism in NPHS2 was associated with the development of proteinuria and ultrastructural glomerular alterations only in ageing mice or when coupled with exposure to nephrotic agents, suggesting a complex pathogenic mechanism [ 110 ]. Of note, the second hit could be either genetic or environmental, suggesting a complex pathophysiology of podocyte damage.
PODOCYTOPATHIES IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT
Post-transplant recurrence of glomerular diseases represents a relevant contributor to graft failure, together with acute and chronic allograft rejection [ 111 , 112 ]. Most of the literature about disease recurrence in podocytopathies refers to FSGS. Of note, this term is used as a synonym for disease entity in the majority of studies. Bearing in mind this limitation, the evidence of FSGS relapse immediately after kidney transplantation improving with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption [ 112 , 113 ], the report of a case of relapsing FSGS resolving after explantation and retransplantation in another recipient with no history of FSGS [ 114 ] and experimental models of glomerular lesions induction after treatment with serum from patients with relapsing FSGS [ 115 ] strongly support the role of the immune system and/or permeability factor/s in the pathogenesis of a subset of cases of FSGS. The risk of FSGS recurrence is as high as 60% in the first graft and up to 100% in the second, with a risk of graft loss of 40%–60% [ 111 , 112 ]. Risk factors include recurrence in a previous graft, age at starting kidney replacement therapy >12 years, White and Asian recipients and rapid course to ESKD (<3 years). Notably, the strongest predictor of FSGS recurrence is initial steroid sensitivity [ 111 , 116 ]. Conversely, protective factors include age at starting kidney replacement therapy <6 years, African–American recipients, genetic and syndromic NS [ 111 ].
Disease recurrence after kidney transplant affects three main areas of interest in the field of podocytopathies: (i) clinical, since the course of disease after kidney transplantation correlates to its specific underlying pathogenetic mechanisms; (ii) aetiological, since the occurrence of disease relapse claims against some causes of disease, while supporting others; (iii) predictive, since quantifying the risk of disease recurrence is pivotal for the post-transplant management of patients and for properly designing clinical trials for therapeutic strategies. Podocytopathies caused by specific aetiologies (e.g. maladaptive, drugs, etc.) do not recur after kidney transplantation, since the leading cause no longer exists. Genetic diseases are supposed not to recur after a transplant. The reported risk of 4%–8% [ 117 ] likely depends on an expired attribute of pathogenicity to genetic variants (e.g. in NPHS2 ). Therefore, reports of disease recurrence in genetic podocytopathies should be reassessed according to the current classification system of genetic variants. The label ‘primary FSGS’ (also known as idiopathic FSGS or circulating factor disease) refers to non-genetic FSGS, whose pathogenic mechanism is thought to be an immune system dysregulation and/or a permeability factor [ 112 , 116 , 118 ]. In this view, disease recurrence after kidney transplantation can be considered as an ex-post clue element for the aetiological classification of the primary disorder. However, precision medicine has the goal of being proactive, preventing and predicting instead of merely observing [ 119 ]. This target is particularly relevant for kidney transplant medicine due to the shortage of organs together with the increasing use of marginal donors and the clinical complexity of transplant recipients, making the need to precisely assess the clinical risk profile of patients affected by podocytopathies undeniable. Despite its relevance, many factors still prevent this issue from being properly assessed: the correct diagnosis of disease recurrence in clinical studies; the high frequency of patients with CKD of unknown origin undergoing kidney transplantation, hampering the possibility to clearly distinguish disease recurrence or de novo disease; the extreme variability in the time of disease recurrence, supporting the contribution of different mechanisms; the availability of pre-transplant graft biopsy and different policies for protocol biopsies [ 120 ]. Of note, the diagnosis of podocytopathy recurrence in kidney allograft still relies on pathologic findings at kidney biopsy. As in the native kidney, histologic lesions should be considered as patterns of disease instead of disease-claiming clues. Indeed, pathologic lesions belonging to the spectrum of podocytopathies can be caused by injurious mechanisms other than disease recurrence (e.g., long-term use of CNIs, episodes of AKI, compensatory hypertrophy, etc.), especially at increasing time from graft surgery. Consequently, defining a risk-stratifying strategy for patients, together with advances in the accuracy of diagnostic tools, is worth the effort in order to personalize the clinical approach to patients affected by podocytopathies undergoing kidney transplantation.
INNOVATIONS IN TACKLING DISEASE RECURRENCE
The correct classification of a disease affects not only the possibility to develop new therapies but also the clinical management of transplant recipients. In the field of podocytopathies, this strongly impacts the exact quantification of the risk of disease recurrence and the burden on the overall graft survival. Many studies have explored the association of demographic or clinical variables with the risk of disease recurrence [ 121 ]. According to this goal, performing genetic testing before transplantation in otherwise unexplained cases has been suggested as a potential strategy to maximize patient characterization by detecting genetic causes of the disease [ 112 ]. Despite the need to be confirmed in additional studies, serum anti-nephrin autoantibodies in patients with podocytopathy recurrence after kidney transplantation may represent a non-invasive diagnostic marker of immune system mechanisms responsible for the pathogenesis of disease relapse [ 66 ]. Serum levels of anti-CD40 have been associated with FSGS, with good accuracy to predict post-transplant recurrence [ 122 ]. A phase II clinical trial with the CD-40 antagonist bleselumab (blocking T cell co-stimulation to antigen presenting cells, including B cells) enrolling kidney transplant recipients is currently underway [ 123 ]. Moreover, it has been observed that the plasma of relapsing patients induces the expression of specific genes (e.g. IL-1beta gene) in cultured podocytes. This could possibly be used as a diagnostic tool to distinguish podocytopathy relapse from other diseases [ 6 , 124 ]. Extending the use of SRM to kidney allograft biopsies, together with the implementation of innovative tools for the differential diagnosis of disease recurrence to other causes of graft failure (e.g. quantification of cell-free DNA) [ 125 ] would represent additional strategies for personalization of kidney transplant medicine, with relevant consequences also for the development of appropriate therapeutic strategies for disease recurrence. All the innovations and avdances presented in this review are summarized in Table 2 .
Table 2.
Summary of innovations and advances in podocytopathies pathophysiology, diagnosis, management and treatment
| Fields of innovation | Cutting-edge features and relevant issues |
| Improving podocytopathy classification and diagnosis | - High-throughput technologies, like proteomics, may provide innovative diagnostic tools.- Non-coding RNA (e.g. micro-RNA) and single-cell RNA sequencing in serum and urine can represent innovative non-invasive diagnostic essays.- SRM could provide the advantage of allowing 3D visualization of the slit diaphragm, giving direct evidence of structural changes or podocyte loss and a panoramic view otherwise not available with the current techniques. |
| Understanding the complex genetic background of podocytopathies and interplay with environment | - Genetic variants in intronic and regulatory regions of DNA can be relevant in determining phenotypic consequences.- High-frequency and low effect-size variants in podocyte genes (e.g. G1/G2 risk alleles in APOL1) can contribute to disease onset and progression when coupled with additional ‘hits’, with the second hit being either genetic or environmental. |
| Coupling new pathophysiology discoveries with the development of new treatments | - The GBM and podocytes themselves are considered as novel potential targets for molecules acting on mitochondrial function and actin–myosin contractile structure. New strategies targeting the short transient receptor potential channels, the soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor and substrate intermediates for coenzyme Q10 are under investigation.- Other efforts have been directed to blocking the progression of scarring and fibrosis following podocyte damage in patients affected by FSGS targeting the inhibition of C-C chemokine receptor type 2, the nuclear factor-κB transcription and Slit-2.- Genetic discoveries will probably play a major role towards personalized medicine, thus tailoring therapies with the best chance of response in carefully selected patients. |
| Tackling disease recurrence in transplant recipients | - Genetic testing before transplantation may be a potential strategy to maximize patient characterization by detecting genetic causes of the disease.- Serum anti-nephrin autoantibodies in patients with podocytopathy recurrence after kidney transplantation may serve as non-invasive diagnostic marker for the pathogenesis of disease relapse.- Serum levels of anti-CD40 have been associated with FSGS, with good accuracy to predict post-transplant recurrence.- Plasma of relapsing patients induces the expression of specific genes (e.g. IL-1beta gene) in cultured podocytes, a potential diagnostic tool to distinguish podocytopathy relapse from other diseases.- The use of SRM to kidney allograft biopsies, together with the implementation of laboratory protocols for the differential diagnosis of disease recurrence to other causes of graft failure (e.g. quantification of cell-free DNA), may serve as additional differential diagnostic tools. |
CONCLUSIONS
Podocytopathies represent a fascinating challenge for precision medicine. In recent years, the efforts of nephrology research have prompted a revision of the classification of podocytopathies based on pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for damage to the GFB. Awareness of the need to integrate information on the pathogenic mechanisms of podocyte injury allowed disease classification to go beyond histology (Table 3 ) [ 1 , 2 ]. Indeed, kidney biopsy provides a ‘snapshot’ of pathological mechanisms active at that time in the organ but frequently misses the cause of the disease. Failure in detecting any contributing component to the pathogenesis of podocyte injury potentially exposes patients to unnecessary or off-target treatments. Cutting-edge genetic, microscopy and high-throughput biological techniques allow diagnostic trajectories to be increasingly focused, pushing nephrologists to get out of the framework of podocytopathies as pure histological entities, in favour of a new paradigm aimed at treating the specific disease of the patients (Table 3 ). Podocytopathies share an unmatched experimental advantage: translational studies aimed at improving podocyte knowledge could potentially provide a solid foundation for the discovery of disease biomarkers, improving the identification of molecular and cellular mechanisms acting in the disease process and integrating them with the detection of the underlying risk factors that could decompensate nephrons beyond the threshold of kidney reserve. Ideally, precision medicine should provide tools for evaluating an individual's risk of developing podocytopathies even before the clinical onset of the disease, identifying disease-causing mechanisms, providing an accurate diagnosis, estimating prognosis, predicting response to treatment and the risk of disease recurrence, thus tailoring clinical management and therapeutic strategies (Fig. 3 ). Even if still far from being satisfactorily accomplished, this goal should be pursued in any patient affected by podocytopathies to the aim of optimizing available therapeutic strategies and maximizing long-term prognosis.

Table 3.
Comprehensive classification of podocytopathies according to clinical history, laboratory investigations, histologic features on kidney biopsy, response to treatment, genetic findings and post-transplant behaviour
SD, steroid-dependant; FR, frequently-relapsing; CAKUT, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract; ED, electron-dense.
| Drug-induced podocytopathy | Infection-related podocytopathy | Pregnancy-associated podocytopathy | Lupus podocytopathy | Malignancies- associated podocytopathy | Maladaptive podocytopathy | Genetic podocytopathy | Presumed permeability factor-related podocytopathy | |
| Clinical history | Onset after drug administration. Proteinuria generally resolves if therapy is discontinued. | Recent or concomitant infections (more commonly viral infections). | Onset of proteinuria (or NS) during pregnancy. Full-blown preeclampsia strongly suggests this diagnosis. | Uncommon manifestation of SLE. The clinical hallmark is NS. | Onset temporarily related to associated neoplasias. | Clinical (e.g. LBW, prematurity, nephrectomy, etc.) or US evidence of loss-nephron mass. | Evidence of familial history of kidney disease, extra-renal involvement, resistance to steroid or immunosuppressants. | Absence of any identifiable aetiologic factor, previous clinically evident episodes. |
| Laboratory findings | Sub-nephrotic proteinuria is more common than nephrotic proteinuria. | Nephrotic-range proteinuria with/without NS. AKI is a common feature. | Nephrotic-range proteinuria, NS. | NS in the absence of active sediment. | Sub-nephrotic proteinuria, nephrotic-range proteinuria with/without NS. | Sub-nephrotic proteinuria; nephrotic proteinuria; NS is uncommon. | Nephrotic-range proteinuria, NS. | NS with SD and FR features. |
| Pathological findings | MC, FSGS, CG Acute or chronic interstitial nephritis are frequent. Tubuloreticular inclusions may be present at EM. | MC, FSGS, CG Tubular microcystic dilation, tubular cell mitosis, apoptosis and interstitial fibrosis may be present, together with tubuloreticular inclusions at EM. | MC, FSGS, CG Podocyte hypertrophy and vacuolation are detected without prominent endotheliosis; occasional non-specific immunoglobulin or complement trapping; with negative fibrinogen staining. | MC, FSGS Mesangial cells and matrix increased; inconstant mesangial immune deposits. Mesangial ED deposits, occasional sub-epithelial or sub-endothelial ED deposits and tubuloreticular inclusions at EM. | MC, FSGS Acute TIN and even massive inflammatory infiltrate may be present. | FSGS | MC, FSGS, DMS GBM alterations may be present at EM. | MC, FSGS Inconstant immune deposit of IgM and/or C3 may be present. |
| Response to treatment | Resolution or improvement of the clinical picture after drug withdrawal. | Resolution or improvement of the clinical picture with specific therapy or infection eradication. | Resolution or improvement of the clinical picture after delivery. | Complete remission with steroid isolated therapy. | Resolution or improvement of the clinical picture with treatment of underlying neoplasia. | Improvement with antiproteinuric therapy (e.g. RASi). Additional benefits from functional imbalance control (e.g. body weight control). | Lack of response to steroids and immunosuppressive therapies. | Complete remission with steroids and immunosuppressive therapies. |
| Genetics | APOL1 G1/G2 risk alleles can be found. | Genetic variants in the CAKUT genes support the diagnosis. | Genetic variants in podocyte or phenocopy genes. | |||||
| Kidney transplantation | Do not usually recur | Do not usually recur | Do not usually recur | Do not usually recur | Do not usually recur | Do not usually recur | Do not usually recur | Recurrence after kidney transplant |
FUNDING
The authors did not receive funding for this manuscript.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1. De Vriese AS , Wetzels JF , Glassock RJ et al. Therapeutic trials in adult FSGS: lessons learned and the road forward . Nat Rev Nephrol 2021 ; 17 : 619 – 630 34017116 10.1038/s41581-021-00427-1 PMC8136112
2. Kopp JB , Anders H-J , Susztak K et al. Podocytopathies . Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020 ; 6 : 68 32792490 10.1038/s41572-020-0196-7 PMC8162925
3. Naylor RW , Morais MRPT , Lennon R . Complexities of the glomerular basement membrane . Nat Rev Nephrol 2021 ; 17 : 112 – 127 32839582 10.1038/s41581-020-0329-y
4. Lasagni L , Angelotti ML , Ronconi E et al. Podocyte regeneration driven by renal progenitors determines glomerular disease remission and can be pharmacologically enhanced . Stem Cell Rep 2015 ; 5 : 248 – 263 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.07.003 PMC4618832 26235895
5. Becherucci F , Mazzinghi B , Allinovi M et al. Regenerating the kidney using human pluripotent stem cells and renal progenitors . Expert Opin Biol Ther 2018 ; 18 : 795 – 806 29939787 10.1080/14712598.2018.1492546
6. Jacobs-Cachá C , Vergara A , García-Carro C et al. Challenges in primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis diagnosis: from the diagnostic algorithm to novel biomarkers . Clin Kidney J 2021 ; 14 : 482 – 491 33623672 10.1093/ckj/sfaa110 PMC7886539
7. Bomback AS , Markowitz GS . Lupus podocytopathy: a distinct entity . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016 ; 11 : 547 – 548 26983708 10.2215/CJN.01880216 PMC4822655
8. Bellur SS , Lepeytre F , Vorobyeva O et al. Evidence from the Oxford classification cohort supports the clinical value of subclassification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in IgA nephropathy . Kidney Int 2017 ; 91 : 235 – 243 27914703 10.1016/j.kint.2016.09.029
9. Parsa A , Linda Kao WH , Xie D et al. APOL1 risk variants, race, and progression of chronic kidney disease . N Engl J Med 2013 ; 369 : 2183 – 2196 24206458 10.1056/NEJMoa1310345 PMC3969022
10. Freedman BI , Cohen AH . Hypertension-attributed nephropathy: what's in a name? Nat Rev Nephrol 2016 ; 12 : 27 – 36 26553514 10.1038/nrneph.2015.172
11. Chen TK , Katz R , Estrella MM et al. Association of genotypes with measures of microvascular and endothelial function, and blood pressure in MESA . J Am Heart Assoc 2020 ; 9 : e017039 32851884 10.1161/JAHA.120.017039 PMC7660790
12. Luyckx VA , Rule AD , Tuttle KR et al. Nephron overload as a therapeutic target to maximize kidney lifespan . Nat Rev Nephrol 2022 ; 18 : 171 – 183 34880459 10.1038/s41581-021-00510-7
13. Lasagni L , Lazzeri E , Shankland SJ et al. Podocyte mitosis—a catastrophe . Curr Mol Med 2013 ; 13 : 13 – 23 23176147 10.2174/1566524011307010013 PMC3624791
14. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group . KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases . Kidney Int 2021 ; 100 : S1 – S276 34556256 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021
15. Kallash M , Mahan JD . Mechanisms and management of edema in pediatric nephrotic syndrome . Pediatr Nephrol 2021 ; 36 : 1719 – 1730 33216218 10.1007/s00467-020-04779-x
16. Cadnapaphornchai MA , Tkachenko O , Shchekochikhin D et al. The nephrotic syndrome: pathogenesis and treatment of edema formation and secondary complications . Pediatr Nephrol 2014 ; 29 : 1159 – 1167 23989393 10.1007/s00467-013-2567-8
17. Li L-Z , Hu Y , Ai S-L et al. The relationship between thyroid dysfunction and nephrotic syndrome: a clinicopathological study . Sci Rep 2019 ; 9 : 6421 31015507 10.1038/s41598-019-42905-4 PMC6478922
18. Rheault MN , Gbadegesin RA . The genetics of nephrotic syndrome . J Pediatr Genet 2016 ; 5 : 15 – 24 27617138 10.1055/s-0035-1557109 PMC4918703
19. Torra R , Furlano M , Ortiz A et al. Genetic kidney diseases as an underrecognized cause of chronic kidney disease: the key role of international registry reports . Clin Kidney J 2021 ; 14 : 1879 – 1885 34345410 10.1093/ckj/sfab056 PMC8323147
20. Pasini A , Benetti E , Conti G et al. The Italian Society for Pediatric Nephrology (SINePe) consensus document on the management of nephrotic syndrome in children: Part I—diagnosis and treatment of the first episode and the first relapse . Ital J Pediatr 2017 ; 43 : 41 28427453 10.1186/s13052-017-0356-x PMC5399429
21. Trautmann A , Vivarelli M , Samuel S et al. IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome . Pediatr Nephrol 2020 ; 35 : 1529 – 1561 32382828 10.1007/s00467-020-04519-1 PMC7316686
22. Wood IK , Parmelee DX , Foreman JW . Lithium-induced nephrotic syndrome . Am J Psychiatry 1989 ; 146 : 84 – 87 2492165 10.1176/ajp.146.1.84
23. Santella RN , Rimmer JM , MacPherson BR . Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in patients receiving lithium carbonate . Am J Med 1988 ; 84 : 951 – 954 3129940 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90077-0
24. Glassock RJ . Secondary minimal change disease . Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003 ; 18 : vi52 – vi58 12953043 10.1093/ndt/gfg1060
25. Moudgil A , Nast CC , Bagga A et al. Association of parvovirus B19 infection with idiopathic collapsing glomerulopathy . Kidney Int 2001 ; 59 : 2126 – 2133 11380814 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00727.x
26. Nochy D , Glotz D , Dosquet P et al. Renal disease associated with HIV infection: a multicentric study of 60 patients from Paris hospitals . Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993 ; 8 : 11 – 19 8381928 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a092263
27. Dettmar AK , Oh J . Infection-related focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children . Biomed Res Int 2016 ; 2016 : 7351964 27294131 10.1155/2016/7351964 PMC4886048
28. Stehman-Breen C , Alpers CE , Fleet WP et al. Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis among patients infected with hepatitis C virus . Nephron 1999 ; 81 : 37 – 40 9884417 10.1159/000045243
29. Santoriello D , Khairallah P , Bomback AS et al. Postmortem kidney pathology findings in patients with COVID-19 . J Am Soc Nephrol 2020 ; 31 : 2158 – 2167 32727719 10.1681/ASN.2020050744 PMC7461662
30. George BA , Zhou XJ , Toto R . Nephrotic syndrome after bevacizumab: case report and literature review . Am J Kidney Dis 2007 ; 49 : e23 – e29 17261417 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.11.024
31. Uy AL , Simper NB , Champeaux AL et al. Progressive bevacizumab-associated renal thrombotic microangiopathy . NDT Plus 2009 ; 2 : 36 – 39 25949282 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn168 PMC4421476
32. Cornelis T , Odutayo A , Keunen J et al. The kidney in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia . Semin Nephrol 2011 ; 31 : 4 – 14 21266261 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.10.002
33. Hu W , Chen Y , Wang S et al. Clinical-morphological features and outcomes of lupus podocytopathy . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016 ; 11 : 585 – 592 26983707 10.2215/CJN.06720615 PMC4822663
34. Anders H-J , Saxena R , Zhao M-H et al. Lupus nephritis . Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020 ; 6 : 7 31974366 10.1038/s41572-019-0141-9
35. François H , Mariette X . Renal involvement in primary Sjögren syndrome . Nat Rev Nephrol 2016 ; 12 : 82 – 93 26568188 10.1038/nrneph.2015.174
36. Jennette JC , Nachman PH . ANCA glomerulonephritis and vasculitis . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017 ; 12 : 1680 – 1691 28842398 10.2215/CJN.02500317 PMC5628710
37. De Virgilio A , Greco A , Magliulo G et al. Polyarteritis nodosa: a contemporary overview . Autoimmun Rev 2016 ; 15 : 564 – 570 26884100 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.02.015
38. Luciano RL , Brewster UC . Kidney involvement in leukemia and lymphoma . Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2014 ; 21 : 27 – 35 24359984 10.1053/j.ackd.2013.07.004
39. Rosner MH , Jhaveri KD , McMahon BA et al. Onconephrology: the intersections between the kidney and cancer . CA Cancer J Clin 2021 ; 71 : 47 – 77 32853404 10.3322/caac.21636
40. McArdle Z , Schreuder MF , Moritz KM et al. Physiology and pathophysiology of compensatory adaptations of a solitary functioning kidney . Front Physiol 2020 ; 11 : 725 32670095 10.3389/fphys.2020.00725 PMC7332829
41. Abou Jaoudé P , Dubourg L , Bacchetta J et al. Congenital versus acquired solitary kidney: is the difference relevant? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011 ; 26 : 2188 – 2194 21045075 10.1093/ndt/gfq659
42. Fong D , Denton KM , Moritz KM et al. Compensatory responses to nephron deficiency: adaptive or maladaptive? Nephrology 2014 ; 19 : 119 – 128 24533732 10.1111/nep.12198
43. Vivante A , Hildebrandt F . Exploring the genetic basis of early-onset chronic kidney disease . Nat Rev Nephrol 2016 ; 12 : 133 – 146 26750453 10.1038/nrneph.2015.205 PMC5202482
44. Chebotareva N , Vinogradov A , McDonnell V et al. Urinary protein and peptide markers in chronic kidney disease . Int J Mol Sci 2021 ; 22 : 12123 34830001 10.3390/ijms222212123 PMC8625140
45. Pérez V , López D , Boixadera E et al. Comparative differential proteomic analysis of minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis . BMC Nephrol 2017 ; 18 : 49 28158993 10.1186/s12882-017-0452-6 PMC5291957
46. Tsuji K , Kitamura S , Wada J . MicroRNAs as biomarkers for nephrotic syndrome . Int J Mol Sci 2020 ; 22 : 88 10.3390/ijms22010088 PMC7795691 33374848
47. Latt KZ , Heymann J , Jessee JH et al. Urine single-cell RNA sequencing in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis reveals inflammatory signatures . Kidney Int Rep 2022 ; 7 : 289 – 304 35155868 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.11.005 PMC8821042
48. Agrawal S , Merchant ML , Kino J et al. Predicting and defining steroid resistance in pediatric nephrotic syndrome using plasma proteomics . Kidney Int Rep 2020 ; 5 : 66 – 80 31922062 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.09.009 PMC6943770
49. Wharram BL , Goyal M , Wiggins JE et al. Podocyte depletion causes glomerulosclerosis: diphtheria toxin-induced podocyte depletion in rats expressing human diphtheria toxin receptor transgene . J Am Soc Nephrol 2005 ; 16 : 2941 – 2952 16107576 10.1681/ASN.2005010055
50. Kim YH , Goyal M , Kurnit D et al. Podocyte depletion and glomerulosclerosis have a direct relationship in the PAN-treated rat . Kidney Int 2001 ; 60 : 957 – 968 11532090 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.060003957.x
51. Ravaglia F , Melica ME , Angelotti ML et al. The pathology lesion patterns of podocytopathies: how and why? Front Cell Dev Biol 2022 ; 10 : 838272 35281116 10.3389/fcell.2022.838272 PMC8907833
52. Maas RJ , Deegens JK , Smeets B et al. Minimal change disease and idiopathic FSGS: manifestations of the same disease . Nat Rev Nephrol 2016 ; 12 : 768 – 776 27748392 10.1038/nrneph.2016.147
53. Fogo A , Glick AD , Horn SL et al. Is focal segmental glomerulosclerosis really focal? Distribution of lesions in adults and children . Kidney Int 1995 ; 47 : 1690 – 1696 7643538 10.1038/ki.1995.234
54. Ahn W , Bomback AS . Approach to diagnosis and management of primary glomerular diseases due to podocytopathies in adults: core curriculum 2020 . Am J Kidney Dis 2020 ; 75 : 955 – 964 32331832 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.019
55. Romoli S , Angelotti ML , Antonelli G et al. CXCL12 blockade preferentially regenerates lost podocytes in cortical nephrons by targeting an intrinsic podocyte-progenitor feedback mechanism . Kidney Int 2018 ; 94 : 1111 – 1126 30385042 10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.013 PMC6251974
56. Peired A , Angelotti ML , Ronconi E et al. Proteinuria impairs podocyte regeneration by sequestering retinoic acid . J Am Soc Nephrol 2013 ; 24 : 1756 – 1768 23949798 10.1681/ASN.2012090950 PMC3810076
57. Barisoni L , Schnaper HW , Kopp JB . A proposed taxonomy for the podocytopathies: a reassessment of the primary nephrotic diseases . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007 ; 2 : 529 – 542 17699461 10.2215/CJN.04121206
58. Puelles VG , Douglas-Denton RN , Cullen-McEwen LA et al. Podocyte number in children and adults: associations with glomerular size and numbers of other glomerular resident cells . J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 ; 26 : 2277 – 2288 25568174 10.1681/ASN.2014070641 PMC4552112
59. Wiggins RC . The spectrum of podocytopathies: a unifying view of glomerular diseases . Kidney Int 2007 ; 71 : 1205 – 1214 17410103 10.1038/sj.ki.5002222
60. Haas M , Seshan SV , Barisoni L et al. Consensus definitions for glomerular lesions by light and electron microscopy: recommendations from a working group of the Renal Pathology Society . Kidney Int 2020 ; 98 : 1120 – 1134 32866505 10.1016/j.kint.2020.08.006
61. Tesch F , Siegerist F , Hay E et al. Super-resolved local recruitment of CLDN5 to filtration slits implicates a direct relationship with podocyte foot process effacement . J Cell Mol Med 2021 ; 25 : 7631 – 7641 34156149 10.1111/jcmm.16519 PMC8358871
62. Angelotti ML , Antonelli G , Conte C et al. Imaging the kidney: from light to super-resolution microscopy . Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021 ; 36 : 19 – 28 31325314 10.1093/ndt/gfz136 PMC7771978
63. Mariani LH , Pendergraft WF 3rd , Kretzler M . Defining glomerular disease in mechanistic terms: implementing an integrative biology approach in nephrology . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016 ; 11 : 2054 – 2060 27630182 10.2215/CJN.13651215 PMC5108211
64. Merchant ML , Barati MT , Caster DJ et al. Proteomic analysis identifies distinct glomerular extracellular matrix in collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis . J Am Soc Nephrol 2020 ; 31 : 1883 – 1904 32561683 10.1681/ASN.2019070696 PMC7460901
65. Hodgin JB , Mariani LH , Zee J et al. Quantification of glomerular structural lesions: associations with clinical outcomes and transcriptomic profiles in nephrotic syndrome . Am J Kidney Dis 2022 ; 79 : 807 – 819.e1 34864148 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.10.004 PMC10795715
66. Watts AJB , Keller KH , Lerner G et al. Discovery of autoantibodies targeting nephrin in minimal change disease supports a novel autoimmune etiology . J Am Soc Nephrol 2021 ; 33 ; 238 – 252 34732507 10.1681/ASN.2021060794 PMC8763186
67. Sethi S . New “antigens” in membranous nephropathy . J Am Soc Nephrol 2021 ; 32 : 268 – 278 33380523 10.1681/ASN.2020071082 PMC8054892
68. Mason AE , Sen ES , Bierzynska A et al. Response to first course of intensified immunosuppression in genetically stratified steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020 ; 15 : 983 – 994 32317330 10.2215/CJN.13371019 PMC7341765
69. Zhao J , Liu Z . Treatment of nephrotic syndrome: going beyond immunosuppressive therapy . Pediatr Nephrol 2020 ; 35 : 569 – 579 30904930 10.1007/s00467-019-04225-7
70. Troyanov S , Wall CA , Miller JA et al. Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis: definition and relevance of a partial remission . J Am Soc Nephrol 2005 ; 16 : 1061 – 1068 15716334 10.1681/ASN.2004070593
71. Ingelfinger JR , Rosen CJ . Clinical credence—SGLT2 inhibitors, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease . N Engl J Med 2019 ; 380 : 2371 – 2373 30990261 10.1056/NEJMe1904740
72. Anders H-J , Peired AJ , Romagnani P . SGLT2 inhibition requires reconsideration of fundamental paradigms in chronic kidney disease, “diabetic nephropathy”, IgA nephropathy and podocytopathies with FSGS lesions . Nephrol Dial Transplant , doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa329 10.1093/ndt/gfaa329 33313878
73. Wheeler DC , Jongs N , Stefansson BV et al. Safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a prespecified analysis of the DAPA-CKD trial . Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021 ; 9 : 22 – 31 10.1093/ndt/gfab335 PMC9395378 34850160
74. EMPA-KIDNEY (The Study of Heart and Kidney Protection With Empagliflozin) . ClinicalTrials.gov (4 May 2022, date last accessed)
75. Barton M , Tharaux P-L . Endothelin and the podocyte . Clin Kidney J 2012 ; 5 : 17 – 27 26069741 10.1093/ckj/sfs001 PMC4400467
76. Study of Sparsentan in Patients with Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). ClinicalTrials.gov (8 July 2021, date last accessed)
77. Atrasentan in Patients with Proteinuric Glomerular Diseases - ClinicalTrials.gov (16 March 2022, date last accessed)
78. Trachtman H , Vento S , Herreshoff E et al. Efficacy of galactose and adalimumab in patients with resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: report of the font clinical trial group . BMC Nephrol 2015 ; 16 : 111 26198842 10.1186/s12882-015-0094-5 PMC4511259
79. Daehn IS , Duffield JS . The glomerular filtration barrier: a structural target for novel kidney therapies . Nat Rev Drug Discov 2021 ; 20 : 770 – 788 34262140 10.1038/s41573-021-00242-0 PMC8278373
80. Yoo T-H , Fornoni A . Nonimmunologic targets of immunosuppressive agents in podocytes . Kidney Res Clin Pract 2015 ; 34 : 69 – 75 26484025 10.1016/j.krcp.2015.03.003 PMC4570600
81. Hogan J , Bomback AS , Mehta K et al. Treatment of idiopathic FSGS with adrenocorticotropic hormone gel . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013 ; 8 : 2072 – 2081 24009220 10.2215/CJN.02840313 PMC3848392
82. A Study of TRPC5 Channel Inhibitor in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy, Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, and Treatment-Resistant Minimal Change Disease . ClinicalTrials.gov (31 March 2022, date last accessed) 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.07.006 PMC8484122 34622097
83. Proof-of-Concept Trial on Selective Removal of sFlt-1 in Pregnant Women with Preeclampsia via Apheresis . ClinicalTrials.gov (10 November 2021, date last accessed)
84. Walden Biosciences Launches to Transform the Treatment of Kidney Disease . https://www.waldenbiosciences.com/walden-biosciences-launches-to-transform-the-treatment-of-kidney-disease/
85. Navas P , Salviati L . Mitochondrial Diseases: Theory, Diagnosis and Therapy . Springer Nature , 2021
86. A Study of CCX140-B in Subjects with Primary FSGS and Nephrotic Syndrome . ClinicalTrials.gov (12 June 2019, date last accessed)
87. A Study of CCX140-B in Subjects with FSGS . ClinicalTrials.gov (5 April 2021, date last accessed)
88. A Phase 2 Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Bardoxolone Methyl in Patients with Rare Chronic Kidney Diseases – PHOENIX . ClinicalTrials.gov (24 March 2022, date last accessed)
89. A Study to Evaluate PF-06730512 in Adults with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) . ClinicalTrials.gov (2 May 2022, date last accessed)
90. Phase 2a Study of VX-147 in Adults with APOL1-mediated Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis . ClinicalTrials.gov (11 January 2022, date last accessed)
91. Boute N , Gribouval O , Roselli S et al. NPHS2, encoding the glomerular protein podocin, is mutated in autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome . Nat Genet 2000 ; 24 : 349 – 354 10742096 10.1038/74166
92. Warejko JK , Tan W , Daga A et al. Whole exome sequencing of patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018 ; 13 : 53 – 62 29127259 10.2215/CJN.04120417 PMC5753307
93. Trautmann A , Bodria M , Ozaltin F et al. Spectrum of steroid-resistant and congenital nephrotic syndrome in children: the PodoNet registry cohort . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 ; 10 : 592 – 600 25635037 10.2215/CJN.06260614 PMC4386250
94. Lovric S , Fang H , Vega-Warner V et al. Rapid detection of monogenic causes of childhood-onset steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014 ; 9 : 1109 – 1116 24742477 10.2215/CJN.09010813 PMC4046728
95. Giglio S , Provenzano A , Mazzinghi B et al. Heterogeneous genetic alterations in sporadic nephrotic syndrome associate with resistance to immunosuppression . J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 ; 26 : 230 – 236 25060053 10.1681/ASN.2013111155 PMC4279734
96. Becherucci F , Mazzinghi B , Provenzano A et al. Lessons from genetics: is it time to revise the therapeutic approach to children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome? J Nephrol 2016 ; 29 : 543 – 550 27209298 10.1007/s40620-016-0315-4
97. Becherucci F , Landini S , Cirillo L et al. Look alike, sound alike: phenocopies in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome . Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 ; 17 : 8363 10.3390/ijerph17228363 PMC7696007 33198123
98. Landini S , Mazzinghi B , Becherucci F et al. Reverse phenotyping after whole-exome sequencing in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020 ; 15 : 89 – 100 31831576 10.2215/CJN.06060519 PMC6946071
99. Website. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim (4 May 2022, date last accessed)
100. Sadowski CE , Lovric S , Ashraf S et al. A single-gene cause in 29.5% of cases of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome . J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 ; 26 : 1279 – 1289 25349199 10.1681/ASN.2014050489 PMC4446877
101. Jayasinghe K , Stark Z , Kerr PG et al. Clinical impact of genomic testing in patients with suspected monogenic kidney disease . Genet Med 2021 ; 23 : 183 – 191 32939031 10.1038/s41436-020-00963-4 PMC7790755
102. Riedhammer KM , Braunisch MC , Günthner R et al. Exome sequencing and identification of phenocopies in patients with clinically presumed hereditary nephropathies . Am J Kidney Dis 2020 ; 76 : 460 – 470 32359821 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.008
103. Bullich G , Domingo-Gallego A , Vargas I et al. A kidney-disease gene panel allows a comprehensive genetic diagnosis of cystic and glomerular inherited kidney diseases . Kidney Int 2018 ; 94 : 363 – 371 29801666 10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.027
104. Yao T , Udwan K , John R et al. Integration of genetic testing and pathology for the diagnosis of adults with FSGS . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019 ; 14 : 213 – 223 30647093 10.2215/CJN.08750718 PMC6390925
105. Adam J , Connor TMF , Wood K et al. Genetic testing can resolve diagnostic confusion in Alport syndrome . Clin Kidney J 2014 ; 7 : 197 – 200 24944784 10.1093/ckj/sft144 PMC3970340
106. Smedley D , Smith KR , 100,000 Genomes Project Pilot Investigators et al. 100,000 genomes pilot on rare-disease diagnosis in health care—preliminary report . N Engl J Med 2021 ; 385 : 1868 – 1880 34758253 10.1056/NEJMoa2035790 PMC7613219
107. Groopman EE , Marasa M , Cameron-Christie S et al. Diagnostic utility of exome sequencing for kidney disease . N Engl J Med 2019 ; 380 : 142 – 151 30586318 10.1056/NEJMoa1806891 PMC6510541
108. Jayasinghe K , Wu Y , Stark Z et al. Cost-effectiveness of targeted exome analysis as a diagnostic test in glomerular diseases . Kidney Int Rep 2021 ; 6 : 2850 – 2861 34805637 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.08.028 PMC8589690
109. Richards S , Aziz N , Bale S et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology . Genet Med 2015 ; 17 : 405 – 424 25741868 10.1038/gim.2015.30 PMC4544753
110. Butt L , Unnersjö-Jess D , Höhne M et al. Super-resolution imaging of the filtration barrier suggests a role for podocin R229Q in genetic predisposition to glomerular disease . J Am Soc Nephrol 2022 ; 33 : 138 – 154 34853150 10.1681/ASN.2020060858 PMC8763184
111. Bacchetta J , Cochat P . Primary disease recurrence—effects on paediatric renal transplantation outcomes . Nat Rev Nephrol 2015 ; 11 : 371 – 384 25917555 10.1038/nrneph.2015.54
112. Uffing A , Hullekes F , Riella LV et al. Recurrent glomerular disease after kidney transplantation . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021 ; 16 : 1730 – 1742 34686531 10.2215/CJN.00280121 PMC8729409
113. Kienzl-Wagner K , Waldegger S , Schneeberger S . Disease recurrence—the sword of damocles in kidney transplantation for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis . Front Immunol 2019 ; 10 : 1669 31379860 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01669 PMC6652209
114. Gallon L , Leventhal J , Skaro A et al. Resolution of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after retransplantation . N Engl J Med 2012 ; 366 : 1648 – 1649 22533598 10.1056/NEJMc1202500
115. Morin G , Legendre C , Canaud G . Management of post-transplant recurrent focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis . Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020 ; 36 : 1994 – 1996 10.1093/ndt/gfaa021 32087022
116. Bierzynska A , Saleem MA . Deriving and understanding the risk of post-transplant recurrence of nephrotic syndrome in the light of current molecular and genetic advances . Pediatr Nephrol 2018 ; 33 : 2027 – 2035 29022104 10.1007/s00467-017-3793-2 PMC6153493
117. Bertelli R , Ginevri F , Caridi G et al. Recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after renal transplantation in patients with mutations of podocin . Am J Kidney Dis 2003 ; 41 : 1314 – 1321 12776285 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00364-0
118. Morello W , Puvinathan S , Puccio G et al. Post-transplant recurrence of steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome in children: the Italian experience . J Nephrol 2020 ; 33 : 849 – 857 31617157 10.1007/s40620-019-00660-9 PMC7381476
119. Naesens M , Anglicheau D . Precision transplant medicine: biomarkers to the rescue . J Am Soc Nephrol 2018 ; 29 : 24 – 34 28993504 10.1681/ASN.2017010004 PMC5748900
120. Cosio FG , Cattran DC . Recent advances in our understanding of recurrent primary glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation . Kidney Int 2017 ; 91 : 304 – 314 27837947 10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.030
121. Lee BT , Kumar V , Williams TA et al. The APOL1 genotype of African American kidney transplant recipients does not impact 5-year allograft survival . Am J Transplant 2012 ; 12 : 1924 – 1928 22487534 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04033.x PMC3387301
122. Delville M , Sigdel TK , Wei C et al. A circulating antibody panel for pretransplant prediction of FSGS recurrence after kidney transplantation . Sci Transl Med 2014 ; 6 : 256ra136 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008538 PMC4394366 25273097
123. Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bleselumab in Preventing the Recurrence of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients . ClinicalTrials.gov (5 January 2022, date last accessed) 10.1097/TP.0000000000004985 PMC11262731 39042770
124. Lim WH , Shingde M , Wong G . Recurrent and glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation . Front Immunol 2019 ; 10 : 1944 31475005 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01944 PMC6702954
125. Dengu F . Next-generation sequencing methods to detect donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation . Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2020 ; 34 : 100542 32265093 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100542