MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122904

Медицинская библиотека · Talanta · 2021

Illicit drugs street samples and their cutting agents. The result of the GC-MS based profiling define the guidelines for sensors development.

Żubrycka Anna, Kwaśnica Andrzej, Haczkiewicz Monika, Sipa Karolina, Rudnicki Konrad, Skrzypek Sławomira, Poltorak Lukasz

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In this work, we have focused on the profiling of 5647 street samples covering marijuana, common and new recreational illicit drugs. All samples were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) technique. In total we have identified 53 illicit drugs with Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), amphetamine, N-ethylhexedrone, 3,4-methylenedioxy methamphetamine (MDMA), 4-chloromethcathinone (4-CMC), α-pyrrolidinoisohexaphenone (α-PHiP), cocaine, and 4-chloroethcathinone (4-CEC) being most commonly found and making 38.5, 17.8, 15.5, 8.0, 3.5, 2.7, 2.1, and 2.0% of the total studied pool, respectively. Except for methadone, all analyzed street samples were spiked with at least one cutting agent. Caffeine was the most frequently found adulterating addition present in around 33% (excluding marijuana) of the analyzed samples. Other identified cutting agents make an impressive group of more than 160 compounds. Finally, we have tabulated, illustrated, and discussed presented data in a view of smart and portable sensors development.

Для цитирования: Żubrycka Anna, Kwaśnica Andrzej, Haczkiewicz Monika, Sipa Karolina, Rudnicki Konrad, Skrzypek Sławomira, Poltorak Lukasz. Illicit drugs street samples and their cutting agents. The result of the GC-MS based profiling define the guidelines for sensors development.. Talanta. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122904.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.