MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
LymphGen-Sig: Integrating Genetic and Transcriptional States to Predict Therapeutic Response in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tumuluru Sravya, Cooper Alan, Jiang Yanwen, Batlevi Connie Lee, Harris Will, Salles Gilles, Trneny Marek, Lenz Georg, Morschhauser Franck, Jardin Fabrice, Balasubramanian Sandhya, Sugidono Matthew, Herrera Alex F, Kline Justin, Godfrey James K
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Genetic classification may advance precision medicine in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but existing tools like LymphGen (LG) are limited by complexity and incomplete classification and do not incorporate nongenetic features that affect disease biology and therapeutic outcomes. To address these limitations, we developed LG-sig (LGsig), a gene expression-based platform that classifies all DLBCLs and harmonizes both genetic and nongenetic dimensions of the disease.
METHODS: LGsig was built on the distinct subtype-specific gene expression signature of each LG class using paired genomic and transcriptomic data (National Cancer Institute/British Columbia Cancer Agency; N = 764). Model development was restricted to DLBCLs classified into MYD88L265P and CD79B mutations (MCD), BCL6 translocation and NOTCH2 mutations (BN2), EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocation (EZB), or SGK1 and TET2 mutations (ST2). Gene features were selected by differential gene expression, with 294 genes being optimal for classification using a nearest shrunken centroid classifier. LGsig classifications were designated as MCDsig, BN2sig, ST2sig, and EZBsig. The final model was applied to RNAseq from archival samples from the POLARIX trial (N = 678) to assess outcomes after polatuzumab vedotin-R-CHP (pola-R-CHP) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) for each LGsig subtype.
RESULTS: LGsig accurately identified LG subtypes using transcriptional data alone and extended assignments to all previously LG-unclassified cases. Importantly, LG-unclassified DLBCLs reassigned by LGsig mirrored the transcriptional and clinical features of their corresponding LG counterparts, supporting their reclassification. In addition, LGsig reassigned LG A53 DLBCLs, characterized by aneuploidy and TP53 alterations, into more biologically and therapeutically relevant LGsig clusters. Finally, LGsig improved the performance of LG as a biomarker in the POLARIX study, by identifying distinct DLBCL subtypes exhibiting a survival benefit with pola-R-CHP over R-CHOP in both LG-classified and LG-unclassified cases.
CONCLUSION: LGsig expands molecular classification beyond current genetic classifiers in DLBCL by integrating both genetic and transcriptional dimensions of the disease to better inform subtype-specific therapeutic strategies.
METHODS: LGsig was built on the distinct subtype-specific gene expression signature of each LG class using paired genomic and transcriptomic data (National Cancer Institute/British Columbia Cancer Agency; N = 764). Model development was restricted to DLBCLs classified into MYD88L265P and CD79B mutations (MCD), BCL6 translocation and NOTCH2 mutations (BN2), EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocation (EZB), or SGK1 and TET2 mutations (ST2). Gene features were selected by differential gene expression, with 294 genes being optimal for classification using a nearest shrunken centroid classifier. LGsig classifications were designated as MCDsig, BN2sig, ST2sig, and EZBsig. The final model was applied to RNAseq from archival samples from the POLARIX trial (N = 678) to assess outcomes after polatuzumab vedotin-R-CHP (pola-R-CHP) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) for each LGsig subtype.
RESULTS: LGsig accurately identified LG subtypes using transcriptional data alone and extended assignments to all previously LG-unclassified cases. Importantly, LG-unclassified DLBCLs reassigned by LGsig mirrored the transcriptional and clinical features of their corresponding LG counterparts, supporting their reclassification. In addition, LGsig reassigned LG A53 DLBCLs, characterized by aneuploidy and TP53 alterations, into more biologically and therapeutically relevant LGsig clusters. Finally, LGsig improved the performance of LG as a biomarker in the POLARIX study, by identifying distinct DLBCL subtypes exhibiting a survival benefit with pola-R-CHP over R-CHOP in both LG-classified and LG-unclassified cases.
CONCLUSION: LGsig expands molecular classification beyond current genetic classifiers in DLBCL by integrating both genetic and transcriptional dimensions of the disease to better inform subtype-specific therapeutic strategies.