Khirurgiia · 2018
[Is medication possible for acute appendicitis?].
Клинический случайПисьмо в редакциюНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sovtsov S A, Kriger A G, Pribytkova O V, Smirnov A V
Аннотация
AIM: To study the possibility of antibacterial therapy for acute appendicitis as an alternative to surgical treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: For the period 1985-2010 diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 5548 patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Acute phlegmonous or gangrenous appendicitis was observed in 2275 (41.0%) patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Other acute diseases occurred in 2458 (44.3%) patients. Acute catarrhal appendicitis or secondary inflammation of the appendix were diagnosed in 815 (14.7%) patients; they did not get appendectomy. In-hospital antibacterial therapy has been administered for 1-2 days followed by discharge for outpatient treatment. One patient with acute destructive appendicitis who refused surgery was treated with antibiotics.
RESULTS: Antibacterial therapy in 815 patients with acute catarrhal appendicitis allowed to avoid surgical treatment. Complications (appendicular infiltration, abscess), repeated hospitalizations within 1 month were absent. Antibacterial treatment provided recovery in 1 patient with destructive appendicitis who refused surgical treatment.
CONCLUSION: Patients with acute catarrhal appendicitis diagnosed with laparoscopy do not need for appendectomy and can be cured by antibacterial therapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: For the period 1985-2010 diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 5548 patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Acute phlegmonous or gangrenous appendicitis was observed in 2275 (41.0%) patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Other acute diseases occurred in 2458 (44.3%) patients. Acute catarrhal appendicitis or secondary inflammation of the appendix were diagnosed in 815 (14.7%) patients; they did not get appendectomy. In-hospital antibacterial therapy has been administered for 1-2 days followed by discharge for outpatient treatment. One patient with acute destructive appendicitis who refused surgery was treated with antibiotics.
RESULTS: Antibacterial therapy in 815 patients with acute catarrhal appendicitis allowed to avoid surgical treatment. Complications (appendicular infiltration, abscess), repeated hospitalizations within 1 month were absent. Antibacterial treatment provided recovery in 1 patient with destructive appendicitis who refused surgical treatment.
CONCLUSION: Patients with acute catarrhal appendicitis diagnosed with laparoscopy do not need for appendectomy and can be cured by antibacterial therapy.