DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.10.017
Keloid formation after syndactyly reconstruction: associated conditions, prevalence, and preliminary report of a treatment method.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is 3-fold: to review our cases of keloid formation after syndactyly release, to report a clinical association between primary enlargement of the digits and risk of keloid formation, and to report treatment using low-dose, short-term methotrexate as an adjunct to revision surgery.
METHODS
A retrospective review of patients identified with keloid formation after syndactyly reconstruction showed associated enlargement of the involved digits. A search of medical records for cases in which both syndactyly and digital enlargement occurred was carried out. Charts and images, where available, were reviewed for information about age, gender, involved site, associated conditions, and treatment.
RESULTS
Eight cases of keloids occurred in 1004 surgical procedures in 681 patients carried out during the 20-year period reviewed. Seven patients were white and 1 was Hispanic. Seven of the 8 had associated primary digital enlargement. Two patients who had enlarged syndactylized digits did not develop keloids after surgery. There was no family history in any case. Standard treatment (pressure, topical or intralesional corticosteroids, and re-excision) was unsuccessful in resolving the keloids. Two children treated with adjunctive methotrexate had successful treatment of their keloids and near-normal healing. Length of follow-up time after the last treatment ranged from 6 months to 11 years (average, 5.5 years).
CONCLUSIONS
Primary digital enlargement is highly predictive of risk of keloid formation after syndactyly reconstruction. Very-low-dose, short-term methotrexate was successful as an adjunct to surgical treatment in 2 cases.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.