DOI 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90256-1
Clinical experience in seventy-seven patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Аннотация
Seventy-seven patients with drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (28 patients) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (49 patients) underwent implantation of an automatic cardioverter defibrillator (AICD). The 67 men and 10 women, with a mean age of 60 +/- 12 years (range 18 to 79), had coronary artery disease (60 patients), idiopathic cardiomyopathy (eight patients), mitral valve prolapse (four patients), hypertensive heart disease (one patient), Ebstein's anomaly (one patient), long QT syndrome (one patient), and primary electrical disease (two patients). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 35 +/- 16% (range 10% to 75%). Sustained VT/VF was induced in 64 patients (83%) at baseline electrophysiologic testing. A mean of 4.1 +/- 1.3 antiarrhythmic drugs failed to control the arrhythmia. Associated surgery at AICD implantation included coronary artery bypass in 19 patients, coronary bypass with aneurysmectomy in six patients, and aneurysmectomy alone in one patient. Five patients had only prophylactic patches implanted during aneurysmectomy or coronary bypass and the AICD device was subsequently implanted under local anesthesia to prevent arrhythmia recurrence or to control persistently inducible VT. Operative mortality was 2.6% with two deaths from intractable VF. Fifty-two patients (69%) continued receiving antiarrhythmic drugs to suppress spontaneous VT. During a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 13 months (range 1 to 63), six patients died: two suddenly due to probable pulse generator failure (greater than 2 years old), one of acute myocardial infarction, two of heart failure, and one of respiratory failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.