MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.11.014

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2022

Protocols in the management of cleft lip and palate: A systematic review.

Wadde Kavita, Chowdhar Asha, Venkatakrishnan Lakshmi, Ghodake Monali, Sachdev Sanpreet Singh, Chhapane Ashwini

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To identify clinical decisions on surgical as well as non-surgical modalities for the treatment of CLP patients based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

PubMed, Ebscohost, and Cochrane Library were searched and 20 articles based on RCTs conducted on cleft patient management were identified.

RESULTS

The topics explored were infant orthopedics, lip and palate repair, alveolar bone grafting, and management of cleft maxillary hypoplasia. Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) was found to have great benefits when carried out within one month of birth. Fisher and Mohler's lip repair technique and use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rh-BMP2) for alveolar bone grafting showed promising results. rh-BMP2 for alveolar bone grafting appears to be a promising alternative to autografts.

CONCLUSION

Early commencement of NAM in neonatal life is of great benefit to cleft patients. There is a need for more multicentre collaborations, mainly to identify the ideal surgical technique to reduce the variability in treatment and to ensure that the patient receives appropriate evidence-based treatment.

Для цитирования: Wadde Kavita, Chowdhar Asha, Venkatakrishnan Lakshmi, Ghodake Monali, Sachdev Sanpreet Singh, Chhapane Ashwini. Protocols in the management of cleft lip and palate: A systematic review.. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.11.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.