MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00204-020-02802-6

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of toxicology · 2020

The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods.

Krebs Alice, van Vugt-Lussenburg Barbara M A, Waldmann Tanja, Albrecht Wiebke, Boei Jan, Ter Braak Bas, Brajnik Maja, Braunbeck Thomas, Brecklinghaus Tim, Busquet Francois, Dinnyes Andras, Dokler Joh, Dolde Xenia, Exner Thomas E, Fisher Ciarán, Fluri David, Forsby Anna, Hengstler Jan G, Holzer Anna-Katharina, Janstova Zofia, Jennings Paul, Kisitu Jaffar, Kobolak Julianna, Kumar Manoj, Limonciel Alice, Lundqvist Jessica, Mihalik Balázs, Moritz Wolfgang, Pallocca Giorgia, Ulloa Andrea Paola Cediel, Pastor Manuel, Rovida Costanza, Sarkans Ugis, Schimming Johannes P, Schmidt Bela Z, Stöber Regina, Strassfeld Tobias, van de Water Bob, Wilmes Anja, van der Burg Bart, Verfaillie Catherine M, von Hellfeld Rebecca, Vrieling Harry, Vrijenhoek Nanette G, Leist Marcel

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Hazard assessment, based on new approach methods (NAM), requires the use of batteries of assays, where individual tests may be contributed by different laboratories. A unified strategy for such collaborative testing is presented. It details all procedures required to allow test information to be usable for integrated hazard assessment, strategic project decisions and/or for regulatory purposes. The EU-ToxRisk project developed a strategy to provide regulatorily valid data, and exemplified this using a panel of > 20 assays (with > 50 individual endpoints), each exposed to 19 well-known test compounds (e.g. rotenone, colchicine, mercury, paracetamol, rifampicine, paraquat, taxol). Examples of strategy implementation are provided for all aspects required to ensure data validity: (i) documentation of test methods in a publicly accessible database; (ii) deposition of standard operating procedures (SOP) at the European Union DB-ALM repository; (iii) test readiness scoring accoding to defined criteria; (iv) disclosure of the pipeline for data processing; (v) link of uncertainty measures and metadata to the data; (vi) definition of test chemicals, their handling and their behavior in test media; (vii) specification of the test purpose and overall evaluation plans. Moreover, data generation was exemplified by providing results from 25 reporter assays. A complete evaluation of the entire test battery will be described elsewhere. A major learning from the retrospective analysis of this large testing project was the need for thorough definitions of the above strategy aspects, ideally in form of a study pre-registration, to allow adequate interpretation of the data and to ensure overall scientific/toxicological validity.

Для цитирования: Krebs Alice, van Vugt-Lussenburg Barbara M A, Waldmann Tanja, Albrecht Wiebke, Boei Jan, Ter Braak Bas, Brajnik Maja, Braunbeck Thomas, Brecklinghaus Tim, Busquet Francois, Dinnyes Andras, Dokler Joh, Dolde Xenia, Exner Thomas E, Fisher Ciarán, Fluri David, Forsby Anna, Hengstler Jan G, Holzer Anna-Katharina, Janstova Zofia, Jennings Paul, Kisitu Jaffar, Kobolak Julianna, Kumar Manoj, Limonciel Alice, Lundqvist Jessica, Mihalik Balázs, Moritz Wolfgang, Pallocca Giorgia, Ulloa Andrea Paola Cediel, Pastor Manuel, Rovida Costanza, Sarkans Ugis, Schimming Johannes P, Schmidt Bela Z, Stöber Regina, Strassfeld Tobias, van de Water Bob, Wilmes Anja, van der Burg Bart, Verfaillie Catherine M, von Hellfeld Rebecca, Vrieling Harry, Vrijenhoek Nanette G, Leist Marcel. The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods.. Archives of toxicology. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02802-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.