MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0956462413486460

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of STD & AIDS · 2013

Trichomonas vaginalis: an audit of clinical practice and the demography of infected patients at three London genitourinary medicine clinics.

Tittle Victoria, Bull Lauren, Boag Fiona

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This audit aimed to review clinical standards for Trichomonas vaginalis against British Association of Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) guidelines. Case notes for patients who had a positive microscopy or culture result were reviewed retrospectively. There was a 0.23% positivity rate for T. vaginalis (n = 84 cases); 96% were female with an average age of 33 years, with proportionally more patients seen in the African/Caribbean population, despite the number of cases being comparable between white (n = 36) and African/Caribbean (n = 34) groups. Seventy percent of patients had both microscopy- and culture-positive results for T. vaginalis. Contact tracing occurred in 87% of patients; 56% of these patients confirmed at least one contact had been treated in the last month. Overall, our data demonstrated a lower positivity rate than expected. Wet microscopy and liquid medium cultures were both important in identifying the infection, but more needs to be done to ensure partner notification has been documented and contacts have been treated.

Для цитирования: Tittle Victoria, Bull Lauren, Boag Fiona. Trichomonas vaginalis: an audit of clinical practice and the demography of infected patients at three London genitourinary medicine clinics.. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0956462413486460.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.