European journal of neurology · 2020
Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome with different types of hormonal contraceptives in women of child-bearing age.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Etminan M, Khosrow-Khavar F, Sodhi M, Carleton B, Magee L A, Tremlett H, Kezouh A, Sheldon C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a lack of comparative safety data on the risk of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS) associated with different hormonal contraceptives. We sought to quantify the risk of PTCS associated with eight different types of hormonal contraceptives compared with oral levonorgestrel.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, with a case-control analysis of 4 871 504 women aged 15-45 years in the period 2008-2015, using IQVIA Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records data in the USA. Patients who used nine different contraceptive agents including intrauterine levonorgestrel, medroxyprogesterone injection, etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring and combination oral contraceptives (COCs) that contained ethinyl estradiol and the progestins levonorgestrel, norgestimate, desogestrel, norethindrone and drospirenone, were included. Diagnosis of PTCS was defined using the first International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th revision, code for intracranial hypertension in patients who had also received an imaging code in the 30 days prior to the index date.
RESULTS: A total of 3323 PTCS cases and 13 292 matched controls were identified. No increase in risk was found when analysing intrauterine levonorgestrel or COCs containing desogestrel, norethindrone, drospirenone, norgestimate or norgestrel versus COC levonorgestrel. The adjusted incidence rate ratio for etonogestrel/etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring and medroxyprogesterone suspension compared with levonorgestrel COC was 4.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.98-9.96] and 2.20 (95% CI 1.33-3.64), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found an elevated risk for PTCS among users of etonogestrel vaginal ring and medroxyprogesterone suspension when compared with oral levonorgestrel. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, with a case-control analysis of 4 871 504 women aged 15-45 years in the period 2008-2015, using IQVIA Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records data in the USA. Patients who used nine different contraceptive agents including intrauterine levonorgestrel, medroxyprogesterone injection, etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring and combination oral contraceptives (COCs) that contained ethinyl estradiol and the progestins levonorgestrel, norgestimate, desogestrel, norethindrone and drospirenone, were included. Diagnosis of PTCS was defined using the first International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th revision, code for intracranial hypertension in patients who had also received an imaging code in the 30 days prior to the index date.
RESULTS: A total of 3323 PTCS cases and 13 292 matched controls were identified. No increase in risk was found when analysing intrauterine levonorgestrel or COCs containing desogestrel, norethindrone, drospirenone, norgestimate or norgestrel versus COC levonorgestrel. The adjusted incidence rate ratio for etonogestrel/etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring and medroxyprogesterone suspension compared with levonorgestrel COC was 4.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.98-9.96] and 2.20 (95% CI 1.33-3.64), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found an elevated risk for PTCS among users of etonogestrel vaginal ring and medroxyprogesterone suspension when compared with oral levonorgestrel. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.