Right Heart Reverse Remodeling and Prosthetic Valve Function After Transcatheter vs Surgical Pulmonary Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND

There are limited data about postprocedural right heart reverse remodeling and long-term prosthesis durability after transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) and how these compare to surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare right heart reverse remodeling, pulmonary valve gradients, and prosthetic valve dysfunction after TPVR vs SPVR.

METHODS

Patients with TPVR were matched 1:2 to patients with SPVR based on age, sex, body surface area, congenital heart lesion, and procedure year. Right heart indexes (right atrial [RA] reservoir strain, RA volume index, RA pressure, right ventricular [RV] global longitudinal strain, RV end-diastolic area, and RV systolic pressure) were assessed at baseline (preintervention), 1 year postintervention, and 3 years postintervention. Pulmonary valve gradients were assessed at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years postintervention.

RESULTS

There were 64 and 128 patients in the TPVR and SPVR groups, respectively. Among patients with TPVR, 46 (72%) and 18 (28%) received Melody (Medtronic) vs SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences) valves, respectively. The TPVR group had greater postprocedural improvement in RA reservoir strain and RV global longitudinal strain at 1 and 3 years. The TPVR group had a higher risk of prosthetic valve dysfunction mostly because of a higher incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis compared to SPVR but a similar risk of pulmonary valve reintervention because some of the patients with endocarditis received medical therapy only. Both groups had similar pulmonary valve mean gradients at 9 years postintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a more favorable right heart outcome after TPVR. However, the risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis and prosthetic valve dysfunction remains a major concern.