Urologic oncology · 2025
Early real-world utilization of avelumab switch maintenance among patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma without progression following treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moon Helen H, Aragon-Ching Jeanny B, Thompson Allison, Abraham Anup, Vlahiotis Anna, Ike Chiemeka, Benjumea Darrin, Shao Anran, Sun Haiyan, Kearney Mairead, Gharibian Norbek, Hanson Sarah, Li Benjamin, Kirker Melissa, Grivas Petros
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) is first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1L PBC) followed by avelumab 1L switch maintenance (1LM) in patients without progression. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with la/mUC in the US treated with 1L PBC and characterize the early adoption of avelumab 1LM following FDA approval in June 2020.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified adults diagnosed with la/mUC between January 2017 and September 2021 using electronic health records from the Flatiron Health database. Patients were grouped based on real-world response to 1L PBC: complete or partial response (rwCR/PR) or stable disease (rwSD). Baseline characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Clinical outcomes, including real-world overall survival (rwOS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS), were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Of 1,703 identified patients with la/mUC treated with 1L PBC, 1,245 (73%) had response data available during the study period, with 998 (80%) having a best response of rwCR/PR (60%) or rwSD (20%). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between patients with rwCR/PR and rwSD. Patients with rwCR/PR had longer median rwOS and rwPFS from 1L PBC initiation vs patients with rwSD. Of patients evaluated after FDA approval of avelumab 1LM on June 30, 2020, 435 discontinued 1L PBC. Of these patients, 339 had response data, and 138 of those without progression were considered avelumab 1LM eligible. Of these, 97 (70%) initiated avelumab 1LM within 180 days following last administration of 1L PBC, with 40 patients receiving second-line (2L) treatment, most commonly enfortumab vedotin (60%).
CONCLUSION: In the post-FDA approval period, uptake of avelumab 1LM was high (70%) in patients with rwSD or rwCR/PR following 1L PBC, and 41% of these patients received 2L treatment, most commonly with enfortumab vedotin.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified adults diagnosed with la/mUC between January 2017 and September 2021 using electronic health records from the Flatiron Health database. Patients were grouped based on real-world response to 1L PBC: complete or partial response (rwCR/PR) or stable disease (rwSD). Baseline characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Clinical outcomes, including real-world overall survival (rwOS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS), were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Of 1,703 identified patients with la/mUC treated with 1L PBC, 1,245 (73%) had response data available during the study period, with 998 (80%) having a best response of rwCR/PR (60%) or rwSD (20%). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between patients with rwCR/PR and rwSD. Patients with rwCR/PR had longer median rwOS and rwPFS from 1L PBC initiation vs patients with rwSD. Of patients evaluated after FDA approval of avelumab 1LM on June 30, 2020, 435 discontinued 1L PBC. Of these patients, 339 had response data, and 138 of those without progression were considered avelumab 1LM eligible. Of these, 97 (70%) initiated avelumab 1LM within 180 days following last administration of 1L PBC, with 40 patients receiving second-line (2L) treatment, most commonly enfortumab vedotin (60%).
CONCLUSION: In the post-FDA approval period, uptake of avelumab 1LM was high (70%) in patients with rwSD or rwCR/PR following 1L PBC, and 41% of these patients received 2L treatment, most commonly with enfortumab vedotin.