DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-90046-4
Analysis of the occurrence of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) features in patients with sepsis: a prospective study.
Аннотация
HLH syndrome may mimic sepsis but requires entirely different treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the occurrence of HLH features in patients with sepsis and the influence these exert on the patients' prognosis. The prospective study included 108 patients with suspected sepsis who were routinely evaluated according to HLH criteria. They were divided into group I (SOFA = 2, n = 57) and group II (SOFA ≥ 3, n = 51). Four patients were excluded from analysis: 1 with real HLH, 2 with Still's disease and 1 with lymphoma. The median (IQR) concentration of ferritin was 613.4 (850.3) ng/mL, however 6 patients revealed a remarkedly high ferritin concentration > 3000 ng/mL, including 2 with ferritin > 10,000 ng/mL. In total, 21 patients met ≥ 4/8 HLH criteria and were found to have sepsis with HLH-like syndrome (SHLS). Out of these, 19 responded to antimicrobials, 2 died due to infection. The sepsis patients presented with the following HLH criteria: fever (95.2%), hyperferritinemia (57.3%), splenomegaly (43.4%), reduced NK cell activity (35.2%), high sCD25 activity (27.4%) and rarely: hypertriglyceridemia (14.4%), duopenia (5.8%), hypofibrinogenemia (1.9%). Although group II patients had higher odds for SHLS presentation (OR 3.26, p = 0.026) and for death (OR 14.3, p = 0.013), SHLS occurrence had no impact on the risk of death (OR 0.77, p = 0.75). Sepsis patients can present with SHLS exclusively due to severe infection. Duopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypofibrinogenemia and high level of sCD25 are unusual in sepsis and might indicate real HLH syndrome. Hyperferritinemia, even as high as in real HLH syndrome, can occur in sepsis patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.