MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.002

Медицинская библиотека · Applied ergonomics · 2004

Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator.

Min Byung-Chan, Chung Soon-Cheol, Min Yoon-Ki, Sakamoto Kazuyoshi

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The present study investigated the effects of simulator sickness, as an important bias factor on evaluation of emotional changes under the controlled condition of driving a car for 60 min at a constant speed (60 km/h) in a graphic simulator. Simulator sickness was measured and analyzed every 5 min using both subjective evaluation and physiological signals. Results of the subjective evaluation showed there was a significant difference between the rest and the driving conditions 10 min after the main experiment started and that the level of difference increased linearly with time. Analysis of the central and the autonomic nervous systems showed the significant differences in delta, theta, alpha and beta bands of an electroencephalogram (EEG), skin temperature, and the R-R interval between the rest and the driving conditions after about 5 min from the start of driving. In particular, there was the highest correlation between parameter of theta and subjective evaluation, and thus theta was considered an effective physiological parameter for numerically evaluating simulator sickness. The results indicate that physiological changes due to simulator sickness can be a bias factor in evaluation of human sensibility.

Для цитирования: Min Byung-Chan, Chung Soon-Cheol, Min Yoon-Ki, Sakamoto Kazuyoshi. Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator.. Applied ergonomics. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.