MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3961/jpmph.22.356

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2023

Factors Influencing Suicidal Ideation According to the Deprivation Indices of Different Regions in Korea.

Kim Yun-Young, Park Hyung-Joo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study examined how deprivation differed by region and the effect those differences had on suicidal ideation among the local population.

METHODS

Data collected over 10 years (2012-2021) in the Korea Welfare Panel Study were organized into 3 categories: metropolitan, city, and rural. A panel analysis was conducted on the impact of deprivation indices, socio-demographic characteristics, and life satisfaction on suicidal ideation in each category.

RESULTS

Income, divorce status, family relationship satisfaction, and medical deprivation had a significant impact on suicidal ideation in metropolitan areas, whereas these variables did not have significant effects in rural areas. In other words, income, family, and medical support were more impactful in city areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the deprivation index was higher in rural areas than in city areas due to an aging population and reduced income levels, the mental health of rural residents was found to be generally better than that of city residents. The possibility that this is related to the strength of relationships within the respective communities should be considered in light of recent discussions on relational welfare.

Для цитирования: Kim Yun-Young, Park Hyung-Joo. Factors Influencing Suicidal Ideation According to the Deprivation Indices of Different Regions in Korea.. Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi. 2023. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.22.356.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.