MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215112002708

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2012

Unusual presentation of cervical spine metastases to the ENT surgeon.

Baruah P, Randall C J, Burgess A

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Cervical spine metastases account for 10 per cent of all spinal metastases. We report three cases of cervical spine metastases whose unusual primary presentation was with ENT-related symptoms.

METHODS

The three patients reported herein did not have a confirmed diagnosis of malignancy at presentation. The first patient presented with stridor, the second presented with dysphagia and the third presented with dysphonia. All patients complained of significant neck pain that preceded and was concomitant to the other symptoms. Clinical suspicion of cervical spine involvement led to radiological investigation with computed tomography, which showed metastatic lesions in the craniovertebral junction and cervical spine region. Histological confirmation of malignancy was obtained for two of the three patients. The condition proved uniformly fatal in the weeks following diagnosis. A review of the literature on this condition was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases.

CONCLUSION

Cervical spine pathology may present initially to the ENT surgeon. A high degree of suspicion of cervical spine involvement should be maintained in elderly patients with persistent or progressive neck pain, with or without other ENT symptoms. Adequate radiological imaging will usually confirm the diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Baruah P, Randall C J, Burgess A. Unusual presentation of cervical spine metastases to the ENT surgeon.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2012. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215112002708.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.