Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
Visual Field Abnormalities in Early-Stage Diabetic Retinopathy Assessed by Chromatic Perimetry.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McAnany J Jason, Park Jason C, Lim Jennifer I
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the nature and extent of sensitivity loss using chromatic perimetry in diabetics who have mild or no retinopathy.
METHODS: Thirty-four individuals with type II diabetes mellitus who have mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (MDR; N = 17) or no diabetic retinopathy (NDR; N = 17) and 15 visually normal, non-diabetic controls participated. Sensitivity was assessed along the horizontal visual field meridian using an Octopus 900 perimeter. Measurements were performed under light- and dark-adapted conditions using long-wavelength (red) and short-wavelength (blue) Goldmann III targets. Cumulative defect curves (CDCs) were constructed to determine whether field sensitivity loss was diffuse or localized.
RESULTS: Sensitivity was reduced significantly under light-adapted conditions for both stimulus colors for the NDR (mean defect ± SEM = -2.1 dB ± 0.6) and MDR (mean defect ± SEM = -4.0 dB ± 0.7) groups. Sensitivity was also reduced under dark-adapted conditions for both stimulus colors for the NDR (mean defect ± SEM = -1.9 dB ± 0.7) and MDR (mean defect ± SEM = -4.5 ± 1.0 dB) groups. For both diabetic groups, field loss tended to be diffuse under light-adapted conditions (up to 6.9 dB loss) and localized under dark-adapted conditions (up to 15.4 dB loss).
CONCLUSIONS: Visual field sensitivity losses suggest neural abnormalities in early stage diabetic eye disease and the pattern of the sensitivity losses differed depending on the adaptation conditions. Chromatic perimetry may be useful for subtyping individuals who have mild or no diabetic retinopathy and for better understanding their neural dysfunction.
METHODS: Thirty-four individuals with type II diabetes mellitus who have mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (MDR; N = 17) or no diabetic retinopathy (NDR; N = 17) and 15 visually normal, non-diabetic controls participated. Sensitivity was assessed along the horizontal visual field meridian using an Octopus 900 perimeter. Measurements were performed under light- and dark-adapted conditions using long-wavelength (red) and short-wavelength (blue) Goldmann III targets. Cumulative defect curves (CDCs) were constructed to determine whether field sensitivity loss was diffuse or localized.
RESULTS: Sensitivity was reduced significantly under light-adapted conditions for both stimulus colors for the NDR (mean defect ± SEM = -2.1 dB ± 0.6) and MDR (mean defect ± SEM = -4.0 dB ± 0.7) groups. Sensitivity was also reduced under dark-adapted conditions for both stimulus colors for the NDR (mean defect ± SEM = -1.9 dB ± 0.7) and MDR (mean defect ± SEM = -4.5 ± 1.0 dB) groups. For both diabetic groups, field loss tended to be diffuse under light-adapted conditions (up to 6.9 dB loss) and localized under dark-adapted conditions (up to 15.4 dB loss).
CONCLUSIONS: Visual field sensitivity losses suggest neural abnormalities in early stage diabetic eye disease and the pattern of the sensitivity losses differed depending on the adaptation conditions. Chromatic perimetry may be useful for subtyping individuals who have mild or no diabetic retinopathy and for better understanding their neural dysfunction.