Surgery today · 2020
Use of a cutting stapler to excise a left atrial appendage in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Orii Mamoru, Hosoba Soh, Tokoro Masayoshi, Ozeki Takahiro, Kato Riku, Sawaki Sadanari, Ito Toshiaki
Аннотация
PURPOSE: A cutting stapler is a well-established instrument in many surgical fields. However, its efficacy and safety have not been proven yet in resecting a left atrial appendage (LAA) in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS).
METHODS: A cutting stapler was used to resect the LAA in 98 consecutive patients who underwent MICS. Of these, 26 patients underwent aortic valve replacement, 72 mitral valve repair/replacement, 25 tricuspid annuloplasty, 7 closure of atrial septal defect, and 26 the Maze procedure (contains overlapping). The ascending aorta was elevated using a retractor, and a 12-mm shaft motor-driven cutting stapler was inserted through the transverse sinus. As a control group, 150 patients who underwent suture resection/closure of the LAA either from inside or outside were compared.
RESULTS: There was one mortality in each group. They were not related to the LAA resection/closure. In the suture group, the LAA suture was taken down in one patient because of a suspected obstruction of the circumflex artery, and two patients had re-exploration for bleeding from the LAA. In the stapler group, there was no complication related with the LAA. The rate of complication did not reach a statistical difference.
CONCLUSION: A cutting stapler is considered to be a useful instrument to resect the LAA in MICS.
METHODS: A cutting stapler was used to resect the LAA in 98 consecutive patients who underwent MICS. Of these, 26 patients underwent aortic valve replacement, 72 mitral valve repair/replacement, 25 tricuspid annuloplasty, 7 closure of atrial septal defect, and 26 the Maze procedure (contains overlapping). The ascending aorta was elevated using a retractor, and a 12-mm shaft motor-driven cutting stapler was inserted through the transverse sinus. As a control group, 150 patients who underwent suture resection/closure of the LAA either from inside or outside were compared.
RESULTS: There was one mortality in each group. They were not related to the LAA resection/closure. In the suture group, the LAA suture was taken down in one patient because of a suspected obstruction of the circumflex artery, and two patients had re-exploration for bleeding from the LAA. In the stapler group, there was no complication related with the LAA. The rate of complication did not reach a statistical difference.
CONCLUSION: A cutting stapler is considered to be a useful instrument to resect the LAA in MICS.