Activity restriction and preterm birth prevention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the 1900s, activity restriction (AR) has been widely prescribed as a strategy for preventing preterm birth (PTB). Over the past decade, the practice has been called into question as numerous studies have demonstrated that AR does not improve obstetrical and perinatal outcomes but does confer significant physical and psychological risks. The purpose of this review is to offer clinicians a summary of the latest data on the risks, benefits, and efficacy of AR for the prevention of PTB.

RECENT FINDINGS: Both retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that AR does not significantly prolong pregnancy including those with multiple gestations, short cervices, ruptured membranes, and increased body mass indexes. Several studies have also shown that physical activity during pregnancy is associated with a higher incidence of vaginal delivery, a lower incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, and a lower incidence of hypertensive disorders without increasing the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.

SUMMARY: The culmination of these data led to the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicines' release of an updated committee recommendation in August of 2020; AR should not be routinely prescribed as a treatment to prevent PTB.