DOI 10.1097/moo.0000000000000669
Current management of type III and IV laryngotracheoesophageal clefts: the case for a revised cleft classification.
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the paediatric laryngotracheoesophageal cleft (LTEC) literature, with an emphasis on recent trends, evaluation and management, surgical techniques, postoperative care of Type III and IV LTECs, and to propose a revised cleft classification system that more accurately reflects our current understanding of these anomalies.
RECENT FINDINGS: There are a number of techniques described to address Type III and IV LTEC, from endoscopic to open approaches with thoracotomy. The surgical approach should be tailored to the length of the cleft and its proximity to important anatomical structures. On the basis of review of the literature, we propose a modified Benjamin-Inglis classification (MBI) with subcategories to address this issue. Postoperative complications are common, namely, tracheoesophageal fistulae and tracheomalacia, which may necessitate subsequent procedures or prolonged tracheostomy dependence.
SUMMARY: The medical and surgical management of Type III and IV LTEC is challenging with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The rarity and difficulties in management of these malformations have made large cohort studies difficult, thus generalizable recommendations have been elusive. Experience and patient selection are critical for successful endoscopic repair. Anterior cervical approach, often with complete laryngofissure, appears to be the most common and preferred method for open repairs, though some use a lateral approach. The proposed MBI classification appears to be a useful adjunct to aid in surgical decision-making for deeper LTEC.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.