American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1992
Amniotic fluid volume assessment: comparison of ultrasonographic estimates versus direct measurements with a dye-dilution technique in human pregnancy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dildy G A, Lira N, Moise K J, Riddle G D, Deter R L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy of clinical ultrasonographic techniques of amniotic fluid volume assessment with a dye-dilution technique.
STUDY DESIGN: We compared amniotic fluid volume as measured by ultrasonographic techniques with a dye-dilution method in 50 women undergoing amniocentesis during the third trimester. Thirteen separate ultrasonographic techniques, including the amniotic fluid index, were evaluated with regression analysis.
RESULTS: Amniotic fluid volumes as determined by dye-dilution ranged between 129 and 4444 ml. The amniotic fluid index overestimated the actual volume by as much as 88.7% at lower volumes and underestimated the actual volume by as much as 53.9% at higher volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in measurement error between the other ultrasonographic methods and the amniotic fluid index did not appear to be sufficient to warrant changes in current clinical practice. A major source of error in ultrasonographic amniotic fluid volume assessment is that one-dimensional measurements are used to estimate the volume of a complex, three-dimensional object.
STUDY DESIGN: We compared amniotic fluid volume as measured by ultrasonographic techniques with a dye-dilution method in 50 women undergoing amniocentesis during the third trimester. Thirteen separate ultrasonographic techniques, including the amniotic fluid index, were evaluated with regression analysis.
RESULTS: Amniotic fluid volumes as determined by dye-dilution ranged between 129 and 4444 ml. The amniotic fluid index overestimated the actual volume by as much as 88.7% at lower volumes and underestimated the actual volume by as much as 53.9% at higher volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in measurement error between the other ultrasonographic methods and the amniotic fluid index did not appear to be sufficient to warrant changes in current clinical practice. A major source of error in ultrasonographic amniotic fluid volume assessment is that one-dimensional measurements are used to estimate the volume of a complex, three-dimensional object.