Asian journal of endoscopic surgery · 2015
Short-stay transurethral prostate surgery: A randomized controlled trial comparing transurethral resection in saline bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yee Chi-hang, Wong Joseph Hon-ming, Chiu Peter Ka-fung, Chan Chi-kwok, Lee Wai-man, Tsu James Hok-leung, Teoh Jeremy Yuen-chun, Ng Chi-fai
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to establish the safety and efficacy profile of transurethral resection in saline (TURis) bipolar vaporization of the prostate relative to monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and to test the hospital stay efficiency after TURis vaporization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: in this multicenter, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial, men aged 50-75 years old were randomized into two arms: TURis bipolar vaporization and monopolar TURP. Intraoperative details, perioperative parameters, and postoperative functional outcomes were assessed after intervention. Follow-up with symptom score assessment, prostate volume measurement, and uroflowmetry were performed at 3 and 6 months.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (mean age, 65.0 ± 5.6 years) were randomized into each study arm. TURis bipolar vaporization had a longer operative time than monopolar TURP (51.6 ± 24.5 vs 38.5 ± 20.3 min, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the TURis group had a shorter catheter time (33.6 ± 23.7 vs 40.8 ± 29.4 h, P = 0.013) and a shorter length of hospital stay (43.14 ± 18.79 vs 52.33 ± 30.58 h, P = 0.013). The postoperative dysuria score was higher in the TURis vaporization arm. There was no statistically significant difference between the two arms in terms of hemoglobin change and postoperative complication. No significant difference was observed in quality of life score at 3 and 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: TURis bipolar vaporization of the prostate is a safe and comparable alternative to monopolar TURP. It leads to a reduction in both catheter time and length of hospital stay.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: in this multicenter, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial, men aged 50-75 years old were randomized into two arms: TURis bipolar vaporization and monopolar TURP. Intraoperative details, perioperative parameters, and postoperative functional outcomes were assessed after intervention. Follow-up with symptom score assessment, prostate volume measurement, and uroflowmetry were performed at 3 and 6 months.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (mean age, 65.0 ± 5.6 years) were randomized into each study arm. TURis bipolar vaporization had a longer operative time than monopolar TURP (51.6 ± 24.5 vs 38.5 ± 20.3 min, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the TURis group had a shorter catheter time (33.6 ± 23.7 vs 40.8 ± 29.4 h, P = 0.013) and a shorter length of hospital stay (43.14 ± 18.79 vs 52.33 ± 30.58 h, P = 0.013). The postoperative dysuria score was higher in the TURis vaporization arm. There was no statistically significant difference between the two arms in terms of hemoglobin change and postoperative complication. No significant difference was observed in quality of life score at 3 and 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: TURis bipolar vaporization of the prostate is a safe and comparable alternative to monopolar TURP. It leads to a reduction in both catheter time and length of hospital stay.