MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances · 2017

Outcomes After Distal Radius Fracture Treatment With Percutaneous Wire Versus Plate Fixation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Anderson Mark S, Ghamsary Mark, Guillen Phillip T, Wongworawat Montri D

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Multiple methods for surgical fixation of distal radius fractures exist, including percutaneous pinning with Kirschner wires and open reduction volar plating. Despite increased costs, the hypothesis of this study was that open reduction and volar plating does not provide improved outcomes over wire fixation. Following Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted comparing these two methods with regard to clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complications. Seven trials with a total of 858 patients were included. Plating was not favored over pinning with regard to clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters. Pinning was associated with a higher superficial infection risk compared with plating, though the risk of repeat surgery was not different. It was concluded that Kirschner wire fixation, which may be associated with lower costs, is associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes when compared with volar plate fixation, although wire fixation is associated with higher superficial infection risk.

Для цитирования: Anderson Mark S, Ghamsary Mark, Guillen Phillip T, Wongworawat Montri D. Outcomes After Distal Radius Fracture Treatment With Percutaneous Wire Versus Plate Fixation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances. 2017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.