MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/dc.20820

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic cytopathology · 2008

Oncotic colpocytology stained with Harris-Shorr in the observation of vaginal microorganisms.

Storti-Filho Agenor, Estivalet Svidizinski Terezinha Inez, da Silva Souza Robson José, de Mello Ione Cristina Jorge, da Costa Souza Paola, Lopes Consolaro Marcia Edilaine

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of oncotic colpocytology stained with Harris-Shorr in the identification of the cervicovaginal microflora and infectious agents. Results of microbiologic evaluation carried out in colpocytology exams, bacterioscopy (Gram), and direct exams of 2,017 women aged from 13 to 80 years were compared. Of these, 83.1% agreed between cytology and Gram, 3.6% partially agreed, and 12.8% disagreed. The predominant microflora was of lactobacilli (63.3%), followed by mixed flora (32.1%). The results of sensitivity to lactobacilli were 96.1% and to mixed flora 88.0%; the specificity values were 91.2 and 92.0%, respectively. Colpocytology detected all the instances of trichomoniasis observed at direct exam (0.6%). The most frequent infectious agents were of candidiasis (14.8%, sensitivity 80.3%) and bacterial vaginosis (11.9%, sensitivity 68.1%). Thus, Harris-Shorr stained cytology was shown to be an excellent diagnostic method for T. vaginalis, lactobacilli, mixed flora, and candidiasis.

Для цитирования: Storti-Filho Agenor, Estivalet Svidizinski Terezinha Inez, da Silva Souza Robson José, de Mello Ione Cristina Jorge, da Costa Souza Paola, Lopes Consolaro Marcia Edilaine. Oncotic colpocytology stained with Harris-Shorr in the observation of vaginal microorganisms.. Diagnostic cytopathology. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/dc.20820.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.