BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2005
Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians' and midwives' accounts.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamal Pallavi, Dixon-Woods Mary, Kurinczuk Jennifer J, Oppenheimer Christina, Squire Patricia, Waugh Jason
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of health professionals on the factors influencing repeat caesarean section.
DESIGN: Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with professionals who care for women in pregnancy and labour.
SETTING: Acute hospital trust with two maternity units and community midwifery service, Leicestershire, UK.
SAMPLE: Twenty-five midwives and doctors.
METHODS: Interviews with professionals were undertaken using a prompt guide. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method, assisted by QSR N5 software.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of factors influencing professional decision making about repeat caesarean section.
RESULTS: Decision making in relation to repeat caesarean is a complex process involving several parties. Professionals identify the relevance of evidence for decision making for repeat caesarean. However, professionals feel that following strict protocols is of limited value because of the perceived substandard quality of evidence in this area, other external pressures and the contingent, unique and often unanticipated features of each case. Professionals also perceive that the organisation of care plays an important role in rates of repeat caesarean.
CONCLUSIONS: Decision making for repeat caesarean is a social practice where standardised protocols may have limited value. Attention needs to be given to the multiple parties involved in the decision-making process. Reflective practice, opinion leadership and role modelling may offer ways forward but will require evaluation.
DESIGN: Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with professionals who care for women in pregnancy and labour.
SETTING: Acute hospital trust with two maternity units and community midwifery service, Leicestershire, UK.
SAMPLE: Twenty-five midwives and doctors.
METHODS: Interviews with professionals were undertaken using a prompt guide. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method, assisted by QSR N5 software.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of factors influencing professional decision making about repeat caesarean section.
RESULTS: Decision making in relation to repeat caesarean is a complex process involving several parties. Professionals identify the relevance of evidence for decision making for repeat caesarean. However, professionals feel that following strict protocols is of limited value because of the perceived substandard quality of evidence in this area, other external pressures and the contingent, unique and often unanticipated features of each case. Professionals also perceive that the organisation of care plays an important role in rates of repeat caesarean.
CONCLUSIONS: Decision making for repeat caesarean is a social practice where standardised protocols may have limited value. Attention needs to be given to the multiple parties involved in the decision-making process. Reflective practice, opinion leadership and role modelling may offer ways forward but will require evaluation.