MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2450/2007.0005-07

Медицинская библиотека · Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2007

Adverse reactions during voluntary donation of blood and/or blood components. A statistical-epidemiological study.

Crocco Antonio, D'Elia Domenico

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Voluntary donors normally tolerate blood donation very well, but, occasionally, adverse reactions of variable severity may occur during or at the end of the collection. Aim of this study was to estimate and possibly avoid the cause of unwanted reactions.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The study was conducted over a period of 6 months, from 24(th) October, 2005 to 24(th) April 2006. The donor population analysed consisted of 4,906 donors (3,716 male and 1,190 female). In total, 3,983 (81%) voluntaries have donated whole blood, 851 (17%) plasma from apheresis, 64 (1.3%) experienced multicomponent donation, and 8 (0.1%) were donors of plasma-platelet apheresis.

RESULTS

Only 63 donors (1.2% of all the volunteers) suffered some kind of adverse reaction: 59 (1.08% of the subjects) had mild reactions (agitation, sweating, pallor, cold feeling, sense of weakness, nausea), and only 4 (3 males and 1 female, 0.2%) had more severe disorders, including vomiting, loss of consciousness, and convulsive syncope.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of donors who developed disturbances during or at the end of blood donations was very low, it is nevertheless desirable to reduce risks to a minimum. A set of advices is provided for preventing problems.

Для цитирования: Crocco Antonio, D'Elia Domenico. Adverse reactions during voluntary donation of blood and/or blood components. A statistical-epidemiological study.. Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue. 2007. DOI: 10.2450/2007.0005-07.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.