The journal of contemporary dental practice · 2012
Evaluation of apical sealing ability of four different sealers using centrifuging dye penetration method: an in vitro study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Joseph Romel, Singh Shishir
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the apical seal obtained with four root canal sealers AH 26, Sealapex, Endoflas FS and AH Plus, with lateral condensation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty root canals were prepared using the step-back technique. The specimens were divided into four experimental groups of 12 teeth and two control groups of 12 teeth. The experimental groups were obturated by laterally condensed gutta-percha with one of the tested sealers and control groups were obturated without any sealer. Methylene blue dye penetration with centrifuging method was used to evaluate the apical sealing ability. The quantitative apical leakage of each specimen was measured after 2 weeks.
RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences between all groups except between AH Plus and Endoflas FS (<0.05). AH Plus showed significantly less leakage than Endoflas FS.
CONCLUSION: AH Plus showed the least leakage compared to AH 26, Sealapex and Endoflas FS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty root canals were prepared using the step-back technique. The specimens were divided into four experimental groups of 12 teeth and two control groups of 12 teeth. The experimental groups were obturated by laterally condensed gutta-percha with one of the tested sealers and control groups were obturated without any sealer. Methylene blue dye penetration with centrifuging method was used to evaluate the apical sealing ability. The quantitative apical leakage of each specimen was measured after 2 weeks.
RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences between all groups except between AH Plus and Endoflas FS (<0.05). AH Plus showed significantly less leakage than Endoflas FS.
CONCLUSION: AH Plus showed the least leakage compared to AH 26, Sealapex and Endoflas FS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Barium SulfateBismuthCalcium HydroxideCentrifugationColoring AgentsDental BondingDental CementsDental LeakageDrug CombinationsEdetic AcidEpoxy ResinsHumansHumidityHydrocarbons, IodinatedMaterials TestingMethylene BluePolyvinylsRoot Canal Filling MaterialsRoot Canal IrrigantsRoot Canal ObturationRoot Canal PreparationSalicylatesSilverSodium HypochloriteTemperatureTime FactorsTitaniumTooth ApexZinc OxideZinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement