[Does customized weight curves improve prenatal diagnosis of fetuses small for gestational age in a high-risk population?].

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of customized growth charts for the ultrasound antenatal diagnostic of fetus small for gestational age in a high-risk population of preterm.

METHODS

All premature infants born in a French university maternity center for a year and classified as small for gestational age at birth by using customized growth charts developed by Ego et al. were included in this retrospective study. At the ultrasound performed closest to the term, customized growth charts and population growth curves were compared for the antenatal diagnosis of a premature infants group classified small for gestational age in post-natal by customized growth charts and more at risk of perinatal complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven newborns were included in the study. Fifty-one (76.1%) were secondarily classified as small for gestational age although they were eutrophic on the basis of population growth curves and 16 (23.9%) were small for gestational age on both curves. The average time between the last ultrasound and birth was 2.2 weeks. On the threshold of the tenth percentile, the sensitivities of customized growth charts and curves in population were not significantly different (29.85% versus 41.79% P=0.05) for antenatal detection of fetus small for gestational age.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the use of customized growth charts does not improve the antenatal detection of most at-risk children.