The Journal of arthroplasty · 2008
Long-term outcome of surface replacement with comparison to an age- and time-matched primary total hip arthroplasty cohort.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meldrum Russell D, Maiers G Peter, Feinberg Judy R, Parr J Andrew, Capello William N, Park Justin J
Аннотация
Surface replacement (SR) was introduced as a bone-conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA) 3 decades ago, then was abandoned due to polyethylene wear, stress shielding, and loosening. Improved bearing surfaces have renewed interest in SR. This study examined long-term SR outcome compared to an age- and time-matched THA cohort. Average age was 47 years at index procedure with 16 years follow-up (range, 5-28). Revision rates were 86% and 40% in SR and THA groups, respectively. However, at 20 years, with an end point of either intact SR or primary THA in the SR group, survivorship was 64% +/- 6% versus 39% +/- 7% unrevised in THA cohort. Contemporary and rapidly changing technology may result in longer-term SR success and improved THA longevity in young patients.