Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2009
Initial laparoscopic access in postmenopausal women: a preliminary prospective study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tinelli Andrea, Malvasi Antonio, Guido Marcello, Istre Olav, Keckstein Joerg, Mettler Liselotte
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Estrogen loss at menopause has a profound influence on skin, with postmenopausal atrophy and loss of tone and elasticity. Because more than 50% of major laparoscopic complications occur during initial entry under the abdominal skin, the efficacy and the safety of two laparoscopic access techniques were compared in postmenopausal women.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-six postmenopausal women underwent laparoscopic surgery for simple ovarian cysts: 89 were assigned to direct optical access (DOA), abdominal entry (group I), and 97 to the classic closed Veress needle approach, pneumoperitoneum, and trocar entry (group II). The following parameters were compared: time needed for entry into the abdomen, occurrence of vascular and/or bowel injury, and blood loss. Results were analyzed using SAS software, considering P value less than 0.05 as significant.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the occurrence of major vascular and/or bowel injury between the two techniques (P > 0.05), whereas time for abdominal entry was significantly reduced in the DOA group, as well as the occurrence of minor vascular injuries (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this preliminary comparison on the DOA and the Veress methods, commonly used by gynecologists, suggest that the visual entry system offers a statistical advantage over the closed Veress needle approach, in terms of time saving and limiting minor vascular injuries, thus enabling a safe and fast visually guided entry in postmenopausal women.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-six postmenopausal women underwent laparoscopic surgery for simple ovarian cysts: 89 were assigned to direct optical access (DOA), abdominal entry (group I), and 97 to the classic closed Veress needle approach, pneumoperitoneum, and trocar entry (group II). The following parameters were compared: time needed for entry into the abdomen, occurrence of vascular and/or bowel injury, and blood loss. Results were analyzed using SAS software, considering P value less than 0.05 as significant.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the occurrence of major vascular and/or bowel injury between the two techniques (P > 0.05), whereas time for abdominal entry was significantly reduced in the DOA group, as well as the occurrence of minor vascular injuries (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this preliminary comparison on the DOA and the Veress methods, commonly used by gynecologists, suggest that the visual entry system offers a statistical advantage over the closed Veress needle approach, in terms of time saving and limiting minor vascular injuries, thus enabling a safe and fast visually guided entry in postmenopausal women.