Alternative therapies in health and medicine · 2023
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery: Hemi-Sternotomy vs. Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy Incision.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Lijuan, Pan Quanhua, Huang Su, Xu Zhiwei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare patient data from two different surgical approaches for minimally invasive valve surgery: hemi-sternotomy and right anterolateral thoracotomy. The primary objective is to determine the safety and efficacy of both surgical incisions.
METHODS: Between December 2019 and December 2022, a total of 90 patients underwent minimally invasive valve surgery at our center. Among them, 36 patients received the hemi-sternotomy incision with an average age of 45.86 ± 14.83, and 54 patients received the right anterolateral thoracotomy with an average age of 56.77 ± 14.83 years. In the hemi-sternotomy group, 21 patients underwent aortic valve surgery, and 15 had mitral valve surgery, while in the right anterolateral thoracotomy group, 30 patients underwent aortic valve surgery, and 15 patients had mitral valve surgery.
RESULTS: No deaths or significant bleeding occurred in the hemi-sternotomy group. However, in the right anterolateral thoracotomy group, one patient died from continuous low cardiac output syndrome after surgery, and one patient suffered a femoral artery dissection. All other patients were discharged without complications. The aortic clamp time and the cardiopulmonary bypass time were significantly lower in the hemi-sternotomy group compared to the right anterolateral thoracotomy group. Conversely, the two groups had no significant differences in intubation time, 24-hour drainage, hospitalization time, and blood transfusion. On the second day after surgery, serum c-TNT and NT-PROBNP levels significantly increased in both groups, but they were significantly higher in the right anterolateral thoracotomy group than in the hemi-sternotomy group. However, on the fifth day after surgery, serum c-TNT and NT-PROBNP levels decreased significantly in both groups, with no significant differences between them.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive valve surgery, whether performed with right anterolateral thoracotomy or hemi-sternotomy, is safe and effective after the learning curve. Patients can benefit from these advances in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, and surgeons can easily master these techniques.
METHODS: Between December 2019 and December 2022, a total of 90 patients underwent minimally invasive valve surgery at our center. Among them, 36 patients received the hemi-sternotomy incision with an average age of 45.86 ± 14.83, and 54 patients received the right anterolateral thoracotomy with an average age of 56.77 ± 14.83 years. In the hemi-sternotomy group, 21 patients underwent aortic valve surgery, and 15 had mitral valve surgery, while in the right anterolateral thoracotomy group, 30 patients underwent aortic valve surgery, and 15 patients had mitral valve surgery.
RESULTS: No deaths or significant bleeding occurred in the hemi-sternotomy group. However, in the right anterolateral thoracotomy group, one patient died from continuous low cardiac output syndrome after surgery, and one patient suffered a femoral artery dissection. All other patients were discharged without complications. The aortic clamp time and the cardiopulmonary bypass time were significantly lower in the hemi-sternotomy group compared to the right anterolateral thoracotomy group. Conversely, the two groups had no significant differences in intubation time, 24-hour drainage, hospitalization time, and blood transfusion. On the second day after surgery, serum c-TNT and NT-PROBNP levels significantly increased in both groups, but they were significantly higher in the right anterolateral thoracotomy group than in the hemi-sternotomy group. However, on the fifth day after surgery, serum c-TNT and NT-PROBNP levels decreased significantly in both groups, with no significant differences between them.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive valve surgery, whether performed with right anterolateral thoracotomy or hemi-sternotomy, is safe and effective after the learning curve. Patients can benefit from these advances in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, and surgeons can easily master these techniques.