Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction · 1995
[Hysterosonographic study of the uterine cavity].
Клиническое исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rudigoz R C, Salle B, Piacenza J M, de Saint-Hilaire P, Gaucherand P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the reliability, safety and performance of hysterosonographic assessment of the uterine cavity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hysterosonography was performed in 220 patients with injection of sterile saline into the uterine with a novel catheter. Among these patients, 132 patients then underwent a hysteroscopy or hysterectomy with a histology examination.
RESULTS: There were 8 failures: 2 synechiae, 3 atresias of the cervix, and massive reflux in 3 cases. No other complication occurring. Hysterosonography appeared to give more information on the uterine cavity than standard vaginal sonography. In cases with metrorrhage before menopause, the diagnosis was correct in 75.4% of the cases. Errors were related to confusion between polyp and hyperplasia. In post-menopausal metrorrhagia, there was 92% agreement between sonography and histological results. Agreement was 86.3% in cases of infertility.
CONCLUSION: Hysterosonography using saline solution injected with a novel catheter can be an excellent means of evaluating the uterine cavity and can completely replace classical hysterography, thus avoiding many exploratory hysterocopies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hysterosonography was performed in 220 patients with injection of sterile saline into the uterine with a novel catheter. Among these patients, 132 patients then underwent a hysteroscopy or hysterectomy with a histology examination.
RESULTS: There were 8 failures: 2 synechiae, 3 atresias of the cervix, and massive reflux in 3 cases. No other complication occurring. Hysterosonography appeared to give more information on the uterine cavity than standard vaginal sonography. In cases with metrorrhage before menopause, the diagnosis was correct in 75.4% of the cases. Errors were related to confusion between polyp and hyperplasia. In post-menopausal metrorrhagia, there was 92% agreement between sonography and histological results. Agreement was 86.3% in cases of infertility.
CONCLUSION: Hysterosonography using saline solution injected with a novel catheter can be an excellent means of evaluating the uterine cavity and can completely replace classical hysterography, thus avoiding many exploratory hysterocopies.