Journal of critical care · 2025
The prescribing patterns and effectiveness of sedatives and analgesics for severe traumatic brain injury patients in Taiwan.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kung Sui-Sum, Chien Shao-Yun, Liao Fen-Fen, Yang Yi-Hsin, Hsieh Kun-Pin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health challenge associated with high mortality and morbidity. Secondary brain injury caused by disrupted intracranial pressure (ICP) regulation often necessitates sedation; however, guidelines lack specificity for TBI management.
METHODS: This study analyzed sedation and analgesia prescribing patterns and their outcomes in severe TBI patients in Taiwan using National Health Insurance Research Database data (2012-2019). Severe TBI patients intubated during intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization were included. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, with sensitivity analyses for 14-day mortality and 30-day all-cause mortality excluding deaths within 3 days. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance patient characteristics across groups. Mortality rates across groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. At the same time, the Cox proportional hazards model simultaneously assessed the impact of various risk factors, such as age and comorbidities, on mortality.
RESULTS: Among 6030 patients, sedation and analgesia patterns varied, with midazolam combined with opioids being the most common regimen. Compared to the reference group (sedatives with opioids), the risk of death was highest in the no-prescription group (HR = 2.73, 95 % CI = 2.60-2.86), followed by the sedation-only group (HR = 1.58, 95 % CI = 1.50-1.66) and the opioids-only group (HR = 1.49, 95 % CI = 1.42-1.57; all p < 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent trends.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the importance of optimizing sedation practices and enhancing awareness to improve outcomes for severe TBI patients.
METHODS: This study analyzed sedation and analgesia prescribing patterns and their outcomes in severe TBI patients in Taiwan using National Health Insurance Research Database data (2012-2019). Severe TBI patients intubated during intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization were included. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, with sensitivity analyses for 14-day mortality and 30-day all-cause mortality excluding deaths within 3 days. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance patient characteristics across groups. Mortality rates across groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. At the same time, the Cox proportional hazards model simultaneously assessed the impact of various risk factors, such as age and comorbidities, on mortality.
RESULTS: Among 6030 patients, sedation and analgesia patterns varied, with midazolam combined with opioids being the most common regimen. Compared to the reference group (sedatives with opioids), the risk of death was highest in the no-prescription group (HR = 2.73, 95 % CI = 2.60-2.86), followed by the sedation-only group (HR = 1.58, 95 % CI = 1.50-1.66) and the opioids-only group (HR = 1.49, 95 % CI = 1.42-1.57; all p < 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent trends.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the importance of optimizing sedation practices and enhancing awareness to improve outcomes for severe TBI patients.