MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.03.057

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of pediatrics · 2004

Beneficial effects of raloxifene and tamoxifen in the treatment of pubertal gynecomastia.

Lawrence Sarah E, Faught K Arnold, Vethamuthu Jennifer, Lawson Margaret L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of the anti-estrogens tamoxifen and raloxifen in the medical management of persistent pubertal gynecomastia.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of 38 consecutive patients with persistent pubertal gynecomastia who presented to a pediatric endocrinology clinic. Patients received reassurance alone or a 3- to 9-month course of an estrogen receptor modifier (tamoxifen or raloxifene).

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age of treated subjects was 14.6 (1.5) years with gynecomastia duration of 28.3 (16.4) months. Mean reduction in breast nodule diameter was 2.1 cm (95% CI 1.7, 2.7, P <.0001) after treatment with tamoxifen and 2.5 cm (95% CI 1.7, 3.3, P <.0001) with raloxifene. Some improvement was seen in 86% of patients receiving tamoxifen and in 91% receiving raloxifene, but a greater proportion had a significant decrease (>50%) with raloxifene (86%) than tamoxifen (41%). No side effects were seen in any patients.

CONCLUSION

Inhibition of estrogen receptor action in the breast appears to be safe and effective in reducing persistent pubertal gynecomastia, with a better response to raloxifene than to tamoxifen. Further study is required to determine that this is truly a treatment effect.

Для цитирования: Lawrence Sarah E, Faught K Arnold, Vethamuthu Jennifer, Lawson Margaret L. Beneficial effects of raloxifene and tamoxifen in the treatment of pubertal gynecomastia.. The Journal of pediatrics. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.03.057.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.